You don't even understand what the phrase means. The left can't tell the difference between the cooperation of individuals and collectivism. Pathetic.Cooperation is when individuals CHOOSE to work together to accomplish a SHARED GOAL. If at anytime an ind...  moreYou don't even understand what the phrase means. The left can't tell the difference between the cooperation of individuals and collectivism. Pathetic.Cooperation is when individuals CHOOSE to work together to accomplish a SHARED GOAL. If at anytime an individual decides they don't agree with goals of the others they are free to leave. Cooperation is when a group exists to serve and empower individuals. Collectivism is the opposite. It's when individuals exist to serve and empower a group.Society doesn't collectively raise children. The idea that it does is offensive and denies parental rights. Hillary was not "ridiculed" for saying it. She was attacked for being a communist ****.  less

Christians are meant to humble themselves before God, not to the likes of you.

No, I don't see his comments that way. The left see any criticism of anyone who happens to be a different colour as racist. It's mental illness.It is always amusing when the left find something politically incorrect about someone they admire, and the...  moreNo, I don't see his comments that way. The left see any criticism of anyone who happens to be a different colour as racist. It's mental illness.It is always amusing when the left find something politically incorrect about someone they admire, and then feel an impulse to strip them of all honour and expunge them from history.Even if he was a racist, so what? There is no reason to treat one unenlightened opinion as if it invalidates everything else there is to admire in a person.  

Chess is not a good metaphor for conflict between nations. Chess has rules, real life doesn't really. Chess is balanced and real life isn't balanced at all. In chess there is victory, defeat, or stalemate. In real life there can be a win-win situation.&nb...  moreChess is not a good metaphor for conflict between nations. Chess has rules, real life doesn't really. Chess is balanced and real life isn't balanced at all. In chess there is victory, defeat, or stalemate. In real life there can be a win-win situation. America will win. That is certain. What happens to North Korea depends on Kim Jong Un.  

They don't. If you see a leader as more important than a mother, that's on you. It's YOU that has decided to give leadership more status in your mind. It is YOU that have regelated women by your contempt for feminine virtues.Leadership is a masculine...  moreThey don't. If you see a leader as more important than a mother, that's on you. It's YOU that has decided to give leadership more status in your mind. It is YOU that have regelated women by your contempt for feminine virtues.Leadership is a masculine role. It's no better and no worse than all the other roles than makes the world go around. It properly belongs to men because millions of years of evolution have built us to lead. We're generally much much better at it, just like women are generally better at certain things.  less

No, it doesn't make them second class citizens. Authority is NOT a right. It's a responsibility. We don't give children the authority / responsibility of adults. Do that mean children are 2nd class citizens? Obviously not. You're talking nonsense.Male aut...  moreNo, it doesn't make them second class citizens. Authority is NOT a right. It's a responsibility. We don't give children the authority / responsibility of adults. Do that mean children are 2nd class citizens? Obviously not. You're talking nonsense.Male authority / responsibility is just a role. A leader is not superior to a follower. There is a difference between a leader and a dictator. In a free society, the follower chooses the leader. In free societies, women choose their husbands. Your tendency to see the leader as superior to the follower comes from an authoritarian impulse.Authority is rightfully male because men are more psychologically capable of taking responsibility for that authority. When a couple make a decision together, and everything goes badly, women have to tendency to consciously / subconsciously blame their husband. To most women, everything is always someone else's fault.There is no such thing as equality between men and women. It's just the ideological ramblings of the far left. There ...    less

Even if that were true, it's irrelevant. The left don't really care about such things. It's just mud to throw. The left give Christianity a hard time about it, while ignoring the infinitely more patriarchal attitude of Islam. It's just politically mo...  moreEven if that were true, it's irrelevant. The left don't really care about such things. It's just mud to throw. The left give Christianity a hard time about it, while ignoring the infinitely more patriarchal attitude of Islam. It's just politically motivated fake outrage.The real reason the left strike at Christianity is because they know it is one of the main cultural foundations of the west. To bring in the new, you have to destroy the old. They know that in order to bring down capitalism and other pillars of liberty, Christianity has to fall.  less

The bible is very clear that men have authority over women.You don't get to rewrite the bible to say what you think it should. If you don't accept patriarchy, you are not a Christian.https://www.openbible.info/topics/male_leadership

More false equivalency. Trump is a free market capitalist; a real American. Obama is a closet communist POS. So it is natural to interpret the motivation of their actions differently.When the left extends the hand of peace to a far left regime, it will na...  moreMore false equivalency. Trump is a free market capitalist; a real American. Obama is a closet communist POS. So it is natural to interpret the motivation of their actions differently.When the left extends the hand of peace to a far left regime, it will naturally be viewed with suspicion. The right are strongly ideologically opposed to far left scum and therefore people can be more confident of the right's loyalty when dealing with far left regimes.How would the leftist feel if Trump were in peace negotiations with a far right regime? I know exactly what you would be saying... The hypocrisy is yours.Only Nixon could go to China. Only Trump could go to North Korea.  less

The real quote was - "I may be wrong, I mean I may stand before you in six months and say, 'Hey I was wrong,'" said Trump, before adding, "I don't know that I'll ever admit that, but I'll find some kind of an excuse."Only a very honest politician would be...  moreThe real quote was - "I may be wrong, I mean I may stand before you in six months and say, 'Hey I was wrong,'" said Trump, before adding, "I don't know that I'll ever admit that, but I'll find some kind of an excuse."Only a very honest politician would be so real. Politicians don't admit errors of judgement, because of unreasonable people like you. Of course Kim can renege on the deal. What deal can't be reneged upon? If Kim does renege how is that Trump's fault? What could he have done differently? You act as if it's possible to get guarantees when it obviously isn't.If Kim does renege, so what? We're just back where we started. It's not like anything has been lost.Why do you think North Korea wanted nuclear weapons in the first place? It's to strengthen their negotiating position. What do they really have to gain from bad faith? All that does is send things back toward a conflict they know they can't win. They want a deal.  less

Your attempts to put negative spin on Trump's success are pathetic. You just spent months saying that Trump couldn't pull it off and kissing Kim's ass. You have shown open admiration for the Kim frequently. Now you switch to demonising him? Do you think w...  moreYour attempts to put negative spin on Trump's success are pathetic. You just spent months saying that Trump couldn't pull it off and kissing Kim's ass. You have shown open admiration for the Kim frequently. Now you switch to demonising him? Do you think we have such short memories we don't notice?https://answermug.com/forums/topic/58777/kim-jung-un-has-lifelong-experience-in-politics-he-was-born-int/view/post_id/488956Only a little while ago you accused Trump of incompetently blowing the deal.https://answermug.com/forums/topic/57357/bye-bye-nobel-peace-prize-the-don-blew-it-by-cancelling-the-qu/view/post_id/481235The reason that no other president met with him is because they either couldn't negotiate it or they DIDN'T WANT THE PROBLEM FIXED. Did it occur to you that certain globalist interests actually benefit from strategic tension in the far east? The establishment you worship thrives on war and the spectre of war.  less

Of course it is. Bullsh*tese is the language of diplomacy. It's a lie, but it's necessary. Can't you see that?Far left governments either collapse like Venezuela or they rule with an iron fist to stop things collapsing. This deal is the first step toward ...  moreOf course it is. Bullsh*tese is the language of diplomacy. It's a lie, but it's necessary. Can't you see that?Far left governments either collapse like Venezuela or they rule with an iron fist to stop things collapsing. This deal is the first step toward North Korea opening up to trade and moving toward capitalism. The more wealthy North Korea becomes, the less violence the regime will need to use to keep itself in power. That will ease the suffering of the North Korean people.This is the first step towards the liberalisation of North Korea. So of course the people in the gulag benefit most from the deal.What do you expect Trump to say? "I think the human rights abuses are terrible but I made a deal with this psychopath anyway in the hopes that it's the first step towards making things better"?  less

Once again you can't tell the difference between a society and the state. As if refusing to do what the Canadian state wants has any bearing on whether he likes Canadians.I'm British. I'm proud to be British. That doesn't change the fact our leaders are g...  moreOnce again you can't tell the difference between a society and the state. As if refusing to do what the Canadian state wants has any bearing on whether he likes Canadians.I'm British. I'm proud to be British. That doesn't change the fact our leaders are globalist trash and want things that are against the U.S. interest. It's Trump's duty to say no. It has nothing to with whether he likes me or not. You think like a child.  

What a false comparison. Typical lack of perspective. The Berlin wall was there to keep people IN not just keep people out. Reagan said that because he wanted people whose lives had been ruined by leftist scum to be free.East and West Germany had a shared...  moreWhat a false comparison. Typical lack of perspective. The Berlin wall was there to keep people IN not just keep people out. Reagan said that because he wanted people whose lives had been ruined by leftist scum to be free.East and West Germany had a shared language, history and culture. They rightly belonged together. The U.S. and Mexico are nothing alike.  

You can't compare personal relationships to the relationship between nations. You have a village mentality.A country doesn't have friends. It has allies. An ally is something whose interests are aligned with your own. The interests of nations shift and ar...  moreYou can't compare personal relationships to the relationship between nations. You have a village mentality.A country doesn't have friends. It has allies. An ally is something whose interests are aligned with your own. The interests of nations shift and are of course a matter of opinion. So it's only natural that deals between nations are continually renegotiated.The Bushes, Clinton and Obama were traitors. You can trust a president who keeps THEIR promises. They are not honour bound to keep the promises of those that preceded them.  less

Funny how you disbelieve everything Trump says except when he is lying his ass off out of diplomatic necessity....What do you expect him to say? "Kim is a dumb, incompetent loser who views his people as slaves"?When it suits you, you'll believe every word...  moreFunny how you disbelieve everything Trump says except when he is lying his ass off out of diplomatic necessity....What do you expect him to say? "Kim is a dumb, incompetent loser who views his people as slaves"?When it suits you, you'll believe every word won't you?  

Fascism is a type of socialism.The powers that be consider fascism a better model for the domination of man than Marxism because it is more economically efficient.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6bSsaVL6gA

LOL. Being a dictator is not "experience in politics". There is no politics in North Korea. There is obedience, the gulag or death. Trump is a far more experienced negotiator and he is in a stronger position. He has the upper hand for sure.

Everything humans do is based on emotion. Intellect just helps us see ways to fulfil our emotional desires.

Justin Trudeau is an effeminate little beta male b*tch.He doesn't have the balls to actually be real in a face to face meeting especially with an alpha like Trump. So he just disses him in a public statement afterwards. What a b*tch move....

There are many types of judging. Judging a person's actions is a completely different thing from judging their soul.This quote is one of the most misused parts of the bible that people use to self justify sinful behaviour and silence criticism. The r...  moreThere are many types of judging. Judging a person's actions is a completely different thing from judging their soul.This quote is one of the most misused parts of the bible that people use to self justify sinful behaviour and silence criticism. The real meaning of the quote is cautioning against hypocrisy, not saying we shouldn't voice opinions about what is moral and what isn't.  

That's for you to look hard in the mirror and ask yourself. I have no idea what possesses you.

There you go again with your false equivalency. As if everyone is morally the same and therefore respect should go both ways. There is this lack of objective reality in your thinking.Some things deserve respect and some things don't. Some things are moral...  moreThere you go again with your false equivalency. As if everyone is morally the same and therefore respect should go both ways. There is this lack of objective reality in your thinking.Some things deserve respect and some things don't. Some things are moral and some things aren't. People in the right deserve to be respected because that is God's will. Scum doesn't deserve to be respected.It's like the devil being butthurt that he is denied a place in heaven and saying to God, "You don't respect me, so why should I respect you!".  less

No, never. If Trump surrendered completely, turned hard left and started extolling the virtues of socialism, the left would still rip him to pieces.Trump has become a symbol of resistance and surrender is not enough. He has to be destroyed to send a messa...  moreNo, never. If Trump surrendered completely, turned hard left and started extolling the virtues of socialism, the left would still rip him to pieces.Trump has become a symbol of resistance and surrender is not enough. He has to be destroyed to send a message to Trump's base of what happens when someone messes with the new world order.  

Every coin has two sides. Elements of Russia want to dominate and control the west. Elements of the west want to dominate and control Russia. The people who run the west are pure evil and I'm not talking about politicians. Apart from occasional anomalies ...  moreEvery coin has two sides. Elements of Russia want to dominate and control the west. Elements of the west want to dominate and control Russia. The people who run the west are pure evil and I'm not talking about politicians. Apart from occasional anomalies like Trump who are independent, politicians are just servants of the real power. The devil is at the top of that pyramid and I believe Putin is an angel by comparison.Seeking dominance to some extent is human nature and any nation that doesn't do so will be conquered. I don't know what Putin intentions are exactly. Though if he really wanted power he would join the new world order and try to get Russia a dominant position within it. Instead he has rejected globalism. That suggests a defensive posture.The left can only seem to see lust for power in others and not in themselves. It's so blind. The left want to dominate everything and everyone.  less

Socialism is the involuntary redistribution of wealth. The keyword there is involuntary.Welfare programs are not necessarily socialist. I'm happy to pay taxes to support those who can't support themselves, so long as budgets are balanced and taxation...  moreSocialism is the involuntary redistribution of wealth. The keyword there is involuntary.Welfare programs are not necessarily socialist. I'm happy to pay taxes to support those who can't support themselves, so long as budgets are balanced and taxation is ethical (i.e. low and flat rate). If this were done, it would boom the economy so much that very few people would need help and society could easily provide welfare without irresponsible deficit spending.The crucial difference in mentality between the left and the right is that I see welfare as a generosity on the part of taxpayers. The leftist sees it as an entitlement on the part of the receiver. The left doesn't see it as a gift, they think society owes them something.  less

That's a poor definition. It's not bullying to simply win a fight because you are stronger. Bullying is not just the exercise of power. It's the UNFAIR exercise of power. The left's obsession with equality makes them feel that inequalities of power are in...  moreThat's a poor definition. It's not bullying to simply win a fight because you are stronger. Bullying is not just the exercise of power. It's the UNFAIR exercise of power. The left's obsession with equality makes them feel that inequalities of power are intrinsically unfair. They aren't. The left has a tendency to hate winners and sympathise with losers on principle. When a boxer gets in the ring and kicks a lesser opponent's ass, he's wasn't a bully. The opponent chose to step into the ring. The fight was fair. Might doesn't make right, but might doesn't make wrong either.Besides, a president doesn't have superior strength or influence in debate. A U.S. president is not a dictator, his powers are limited. Are his opponents beaten to sh*t?  Did some CIA black squad show up in the night and murder them in their sleep? No. America is a free nation of laws and people can attack Trump without direct consequences. Even when Trump attacks / fires someone who works for him (i.e. a situation in w...    less

Typical response from you. If you just said that in your judgement he cheated, I would accept your opinion. Though instead you just talk sh*t.Flat earthers are making an irrational argument, in direct conflict with the massive evidence that the earth is r...  moreTypical response from you. If you just said that in your judgement he cheated, I would accept your opinion. Though instead you just talk sh*t.Flat earthers are making an irrational argument, in direct conflict with the massive evidence that the earth is round. There is no rational alternative. You have no evidence that Trump cheated. Alternative explanations are perfectly rational.Notice I didn't say that he didn't cheat. I don't know. I merely accused Rosie of jumping to conclusions without evidence.  

You have no evidence that he did. It could just as easily be Stormy Daniels using the threat of pre-election slander to extort money from him. (Either way she's an extortionist. She either extorted money for discretion or for not slandering him. Either wa...  moreYou have no evidence that he did. It could just as easily be Stormy Daniels using the threat of pre-election slander to extort money from him. (Either way she's an extortionist. She either extorted money for discretion or for not slandering him. Either way she's trash.)As the left so often does, you create a false equivalency between two parties. You pretend that both parties in a transaction are somehow equal. Why should they be necessarily? Is the drug dealer morally equivalent to the drug taker? I say no.  less

Bullying implies that it's an unfair fight. It implies the powerful are abusing their power to victimise the weak.Trump has never bullied anyone. Everyone who he has been in conflict chose to enter the political arena and fights with him on equal terms.

Being the other woman / man contains other sins. Tempting people do things that harm themselves and others is wrong.By your logic drug dealers have done nothing wrong. Is all the responsibility for the negative consequences of drug use on the user and non...  moreBeing the other woman / man contains other sins. Tempting people do things that harm themselves and others is wrong.By your logic drug dealers have done nothing wrong. Is all the responsibility for the negative consequences of drug use on the user and none on the pusher?Their favourite bullsh*t argument is "If it wasn't me, it would've been someone else." By that logic an assassin does nothing wrong. He can just say, "Well, if I hadn't taken the contract someone else would have. I pulled the trigger, but they killed him. It's just business."  less

The surest sign that someone doesn't worship money is that they live within their means. The same is true of a nation. The U.S. is not on a financially sustainable path. Those who call for sustainability are not worshipping money. It's completely the oppo...  moreThe surest sign that someone doesn't worship money is that they live within their means. The same is true of a nation. The U.S. is not on a financially sustainable path. Those who call for sustainability are not worshipping money. It's completely the opposite. It's those that call for reckless spending that are worshipping money. They are too greedy to restrain their appetite and they will bring economic starvation down on everyone.The left see a rich man who has nice things and think he is a materialist. Usually the opposite is true. He has nice things but his expenditure on luxury is actually a small proportion of his income. The rich are usually compulsive savers and investors who have great self control and discipline. They are constantly building new things, creating new jobs and new opportunities for society as a whole, but the leftist is too dirty and envious to see it.The goddless spendthrift left act like it's a virtue to be trillions in debt to the man. The left are not holy, they are the devil's inden...    less

It is the globalists who have alienated the U.S.. (Well, real Americans are....)The U.S. needs no aid. It's a superpower. Those who make war against it will die.Mutual defence is in the interest of the west. It will continue whether the globalist trash li...  moreIt is the globalists who have alienated the U.S.. (Well, real Americans are....)The U.S. needs no aid. It's a superpower. Those who make war against it will die.Mutual defence is in the interest of the west. It will continue whether the globalist trash like Trump, or not.  

He knows why Russia was excluded.... It's a rhetorical question that expresses the opinion that Russia SHOULD be in meeting. Russia is a major power and its exclusion from such forums denies the geopolitical reality.Trump views such meetings as a negotiat...  moreHe knows why Russia was excluded.... It's a rhetorical question that expresses the opinion that Russia SHOULD be in meeting. Russia is a major power and its exclusion from such forums denies the geopolitical reality.Trump views such meetings as a negotiation between sovereign states. That's what it should be. That's not how globalists see it.If the G7 wants to be the G6, then so be it. The globalist scum can sink into complete irrelevance.  

He never said that. Typical leftist strawman attack.https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/strawmanHe describe FAKE NEWS media as an enemy and so they are.The mainstream media is a cartel of multinational corporations owned by the globalist powers that be....  moreHe never said that. Typical leftist strawman attack.https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/strawmanHe describe FAKE NEWS media as an enemy and so they are.The mainstream media is a cartel of multinational corporations owned by the globalist powers that be. It has no loyalty to U.S. whatsoever. It's the propaganda arm of a foreign occupying force. It's the new world order's media, not the American media.  

You think like a child. Whether we approve of Russia's actions is irrelevant. It is what it is.Western intelligence engineered a coup in the Ukraine getting rid of the previous Russian friendly government. Russia acted to secure its interests. That's what...  moreYou think like a child. Whether we approve of Russia's actions is irrelevant. It is what it is.Western intelligence engineered a coup in the Ukraine getting rid of the previous Russian friendly government. Russia acted to secure its interests. That's what powerful nations do. That is the ways of the world.The new world order is every bit as ruthless as Russia and perhaps far more so. Russia is a powerful nation and they will not be bullied into submission to the world order. If conflict escalates we will all die. We should therefore deescalate tension with Russia because it is in our mutual interest to do so. Everything else is irrelevant.We pursue peace with North Korea. Do you approve of their actions? North Korea's human rights record is infinitely worse than modern Russia. You couldn't give a sh*t about human rights. Your views on Russia are politically motivated. You hate them because they are nationalist and you are globalist.  less

They're not allies. The U.S. has no allies. It's so called allies are globalist. Until they start to respect the sovereignty of the U.S. they are on the edge of being enemies.

Hello Officegirl. I'm very sorry to hear you have personally suffered. It's true that it is very difficult to put percentages on such things. What I said is just my guess. However I believe that any man who is psychologically capable of rape would do it m...  moreHello Officegirl. I'm very sorry to hear you have personally suffered. It's true that it is very difficult to put percentages on such things. What I said is just my guess. However I believe that any man who is psychologically capable of rape would do it many times. I therefore believe the percentage of men who are capable of rape to be far far lower than the percentage of women who are victims.I am convinced that certain societies have a much bigger problem than others. While human nature is a constant everywhere, I believe that the west has a far more gentlemanly attitude to women than most other cultures. Many Muslim men have a diabolical attitude. A very high percentage of Muslim men think that anything goes with non Muslim women who don't dress according to Islamic tradition. The Koran even says that a man is limited to four wives and what his "right hand possesses" (The right hand is the sword arm. It is openly saying that women captured in conflicts can be used as he sees fit.)"But as long as it is against...    less

What a misandric rant. Your attitude to men is shameful. If a man made some kind of equivalent rant about the character of women in general, he would be condemned as a compete misogynist (especially by the likes of you).Rape of men can't really be compare...  moreWhat a misandric rant. Your attitude to men is shameful. If a man made some kind of equivalent rant about the character of women in general, he would be condemned as a compete misogynist (especially by the likes of you).Rape of men can't really be compared to rape of women. Rape of man would make a man feel that he is not even a man. It's an even more serious crime.In the civilised world, the psychology of a rapist is only present in a very small percentage on men. Less than 1%.There are different types of rape that the law refuses to recognise. The psychology of these is very different. At one end of the scale are ultra violent attacks in the street by someone the victim doesn't know. At the other end of the scale are cases where the woman consents but then changes her mind in the middle of the act, tells the man to get off her, and he lacks the self control to do so immediately.We all believe there are different types of murder, though anyone claiming there are legally distinct types of rape is called a rape a...    less

This attitude is typical of the delusional egalitarian world that the left live in. Human biology doesn't conform to your ideology. Trump is an alpha male billionaire. The finest women in the world are available to him. It is a biological fact that a man'...  moreThis attitude is typical of the delusional egalitarian world that the left live in. Human biology doesn't conform to your ideology. Trump is an alpha male billionaire. The finest women in the world are available to him. It is a biological fact that a man's sexual marketplace value depends far far more on his wealth and status and far less on his youth and good looks. This behaviour has evolved because men remain fertile into old age but women don't. Women are just looking for good genes, not looks as such.If Trump wanted to cheat in 2006, he'd could certainly have done a lot better than Stormy Daniels.  less

That is not a criticism of America. It's not even a criticism of the FBI as a whole. There is good and bad in everything.As always the left is unable to see the distinctions between the nation, the state and society. It's also unable to see the obviously ...  moreThat is not a criticism of America. It's not even a criticism of the FBI as a whole. There is good and bad in everything.As always the left is unable to see the distinctions between the nation, the state and society. It's also unable to see the obviously distinct factions that exist within state and within the institutions of the state like the FBI.He didn't talk bad about America, he talked bad about the deep state.Stormy Daniels is a whore. Whether the allegations of adultery against Trump are true or false, she is STILL an extortionist POS who had be bribed (either to be discrete or not to engage in slander). She is completely undeserving of respect in any case.  less

Commander in chief refers to being the supreme commander of a nation's military. That is what any U.S. president is by definition. As always the left are unable to separate their emotions from reality. Just because you don't like someone doesn't chan...  moreCommander in chief refers to being the supreme commander of a nation's military. That is what any U.S. president is by definition. As always the left are unable to separate their emotions from reality. Just because you don't like someone doesn't change reality.All presidents are public servants. They command the military, not the people. The way you have conflated the two shows you don't desire liberty and freedom, you just want a master that you like.Society is divided because of deep rooted philosophical differences. Politicians don't divide society they just highlight divisions that already exist. Division expressed openly is a good thing. It's the freedom to disagree. Division always exists and the more united a society appears the more authoritarian it is. It isn't truly united, division has just be suppressed.In a free society division is tolerated and all the far left authoritarian scum are free to form their own little commune to fail on their own, instead pushing their insane immoral ideas on every...    less

It seems you've never heard of the concept of extortion. What he "gets" is the avoidance of scandal whether real or fabricated.What would you do if you were a republican billionaire running for president, had already spend $66 million of your own money ru...  moreIt seems you've never heard of the concept of extortion. What he "gets" is the avoidance of scandal whether real or fabricated.What would you do if you were a republican billionaire running for president, had already spend $66 million of your own money running, and some extortionist whore says just before the election "Pay me or I'll tell the world you f***ed me"? If it weren't true, would you just issue a confident denial and hope the religious right still turn out?  

The biggest gift any woman in the public eye can give to women is tell them to shut up, stop whining about imagined persecution, and compete in the free market. Or better still, realise they don't need to compete because men and women are on the same team...  moreThe biggest gift any woman in the public eye can give to women is tell them to shut up, stop whining about imagined persecution, and compete in the free market. Or better still, realise they don't need to compete because men and women are on the same team. Women need to accept that men are statistically more likely to reach the top because more men are emotionally, intellectually and physically capable of doing so. They need to stop imagining some kind of hidden agenda. Trying to make Ivanka pay lip service to feminist talking points is typical of what political campaigns do. They wanted to try to offset lies about Trump being anti women. I doubt it's effective. No woman of Ivanka Trump's intelligence and beauty would ever buy into feminist sh*t. Feminists are typically stupid and ugly. It comes off as insincere for someone of her quality to even dip a toe into that pool.Rallying the base is the only thing that matters. Trump became president by being real and crushing the left underfoot, not by p...    less

Pessimist. It's like society is drinking salt water that only makes us more thirsty and more desperate to drink more salt water. A self reinforcing spiral of decline. Anyone who tries to stop this decline is thought of as heartless and having no symp...  morePessimist. It's like society is drinking salt water that only makes us more thirsty and more desperate to drink more salt water. A self reinforcing spiral of decline. Anyone who tries to stop this decline is thought of as heartless and having no sympathy for the thirsty people. Our civilisation is probably going to collapse and I'm left with a strange mixture of pity and contempt for those who have brought this down on us.  

Only the deep state could do it. People like Mueller are just servants of it. The real decisions are made by the multinational corporate interests that are the real power in the world. Behind closed doors the billionaire class is deciding whether to kill ...  moreOnly the deep state could do it. People like Mueller are just servants of it. The real decisions are made by the multinational corporate interests that are the real power in the world. Behind closed doors the billionaire class is deciding whether to kill him, go for an impeachment based on lies, rig elections etc etc.They're using their AI systems to calculate whether there would be a right wing revolution if they make their move now. Google sees the future pretty clearly. It seems they're too chicken sh*t to pull the trigger or they would have done it already.  less

Obama had no intention of doing so. Deliberately stirring up problems is how the left get votes. All they want to do is throw gasoline on the fire. Identity politics is deeply damaging to society. Though since it does exist, only someone accepted by ...  moreObama had no intention of doing so. Deliberately stirring up problems is how the left get votes. All they want to do is throw gasoline on the fire. Identity politics is deeply damaging to society. Though since it does exist, only someone accepted by various identities has any hope of reversing the situation. I dream of a right wing, disabled, lesbian, black woman getting elected some day. All the leftist scum would be unable to smear her effectively and she would really wake people up. When she told people to stop playing the victim, people would listen. People under identity politics mind control can't hear the truth from a white male. America's divisions would start to heal if someone like Red Pill Black was in the oval office.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FS_wtnsBXI  less

The banks are fascist not capitalist. They believe in a controlled and high regulated market, not free market capitalism.Socialism doesn't steal from the rich. The truly rich avoid / evade tax. Socialism steals from middle class people and almost all the ...  moreThe banks are fascist not capitalist. They believe in a controlled and high regulated market, not free market capitalism.Socialism doesn't steal from the rich. The truly rich avoid / evade tax. Socialism steals from middle class people and almost all the money is funnelled into private corporations, such as making interest payments on the national debt.People of character don't try to steal from anyone.  

Not everyone deserves respect. Your sense of entitlement to respect is bizarre. You don't respect your enemy, so why do you expect to receive respect? Why don't you just stop virtue signalling and admit you have no respect for Trump's base and every ...  moreNot everyone deserves respect. Your sense of entitlement to respect is bizarre. You don't respect your enemy, so why do you expect to receive respect? Why don't you just stop virtue signalling and admit you have no respect for Trump's base and every intention of trying to dominate them forever?Any country that respects all its citizens is stupid. At least 20% of the U.S. population are absolute trash. Trash still have rights, though there is no right to be respected. A healthy civilisation can only be maintained if the opinions of trash are ignored and suppressed by social pressure.  less