Active Now

Art Lover
Discussion » Statements » Rosie's Corner » There should NOT BE A STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ON CRIME but there is. There SHOULD BE A STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ON HATE but there isn't. WHY?

There should NOT BE A STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ON CRIME but there is. There SHOULD BE A STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ON HATE but there isn't. WHY?

It ya ask me (and ya didn't) it's  A**-BACKWARDS! Corruption and criminals should be pursued till they're caught and charged and tried and convicted. PERIOD. But hate that lives on and grows UGLIER and BIGLIER directed at someone who died is insane inane arcane and profane not to mention the work of the devil and EVIL. A**-backwards. Nonsensical. AARRGGHH! :(

Posted - August 27, 2018

Responses


  • I've always favored a statute of limitations on non-violent crime. Good luck on that hate thing. Hate is as old as mankind and as long as there exists a corrupt heart and mind, it will remain. Hatred, malice, corruption and sin will always be a part of the landscape.
      August 27, 2018 8:13 AM MDT
    1

  • 113301
    Why is hate as old as mankind DA? It seems to me the logical reasonable sensible way to go through life (since we are all in the same boat and we know from day one it's sinking)  is to be pleasant, kind, helpful, truthful and fair.  Who can refute the common sense of that? I don't get it. Thank you for your reply!  :)
      August 28, 2018 4:46 AM MDT
    0