What is the difference between a stimulating conversationalist and a troll?
Whether you agree with them or not.
The stimulating conversationalist expresses an opinion honestly
without the use of pejorative language -
preferably giving reasons for the opinion
based in personal experience professional research or sound logic.
It is more stimulating if it's possible to offer an original angle or something new
or if the response is creative.
Humour is good if it is not disrespectful.
Trolls get pleasure from provoking and hurting others -
rather than stimulating they first dangle bait and then torture the caught fish.
I never answer the questions or responses of trolls
unless occasionally by accident if they are new and I don't yet know them.
Once is more than enough.
lol
Very well said.
If I told you I'd have to kill you.
What kind of conversation do you most enjoy, Mr Vern?