Active Now

Twinkle Dink
Gris-gris McMuffin
Nanoose
Randy D
Discussion » Statements » Rosie's Corner » Two sexually deviant harassers are on SCOTUS. Thomas and Kavanaugh. Betcha the gaslighter-in-chief who is one too will get a 3rd! Don'tchu?

Two sexually deviant harassers are on SCOTUS. Thomas and Kavanaugh. Betcha the gaslighter-in-chief who is one too will get a 3rd! Don'tchu?

The minute Ruth Bader Ginsberg retires/leaves the gaslighter-in-chief will go for SCOTUS HAT TRICK. A 3rd male scumbag who sexually harasses the ladies. I'm shure there are plenty more out there from which to choose. The gaslighter-in-chief so far has shown us his unerring sense of who is the worst of the worst and appoints him/her.

Posted - February 10

Responses


  • 37315
    He is not going to leave the planet until he is sure he has done the most harm imaginable.

    He said he doesn't care about CLIMATE CHANGE because he won't be here.  ???? Seriously?  This is who we choose as leader of the nation?  Did he really say this?  HE DID.


    Does he care about his kids?   
      February 10, 2019 5:08 AM MST
    1

  • 66977
    What about his grandkids? Oh. Right. Everything all the time is always about him. SIGH. Thank you for your reply Sharon. I read that by the end of the century the ocean waters will be a different color. There is a huge iceberg melting very rapidly either in the Arctic or Antarctic and by the time it has completed melted it will raise the ocean level by TWO INCHES. Wrap your brain around THAT! Meanwhile the animals who fed off the lands and ice floes are dying because the food supplies are dwindling. All of this is happening constantly 24/7 worldwide. Inexorably. Endlessly. Continuously. And still the blinders wearers either ignore it completely or refute it completely. As they are drowning. Stubborn little beasties aren t they?  :) This post was edited by RosieG at February 10, 2019 5:40 AM MST
      February 10, 2019 5:40 AM MST
    0

  • 14487
    How do you feel about Keith Ericson and Lt Gov Fairfax? Are they sexual deviants?


      February 10, 2019 5:46 AM MST
    1

  • 37315
    How do you feel about sticking to the topic?  Can't handle the heat?
      February 10, 2019 6:38 AM MST
    0

  • 14487
    The topic is those accused of being sexual deviants. 
    I say a person is innocent until proven guilty. 

    Others say the accusation makes it true. #BelieveAllWomen
    Now does that apply to ALL women or just women accusing Republicans or conservatives?
      February 10, 2019 6:43 AM MST
    1

  • 37315
    The topic is the two creeps she mentioned mostly.  It's the GOP move.  Mention someone bad and they have to point a finger instead of admitting bad.

    Let's talk Thomas and Kavanaugh.  They are Superior Court Judges.   OKAY?

    There are creeps in the DEMOCRATIC party.  OKAY?


    This is about Superior Court Creeps and Trump trying to insert creeps to protect him from the good guys. This post was edited by SAY MY NAME at February 10, 2019 6:50 AM MST
      February 10, 2019 6:49 AM MST
    0

  • 14487
    If it can be proven then throw them off the bench. There has been no proof. So they should remain on the bench. 

    Should Fairfax resign? Should Ericson resign? Should Cory Booker resign? Or just Republicans? I believe they are all entitled to defend themselves and they are innocent until proven guilty. 
      February 10, 2019 12:03 PM MST
    1

  • 1008
    Agreed. :)
      February 10, 2019 12:19 PM MST
    1

  • 1008
    This answer is kind of lengthy but I'll post it just in case someone doesn't want to bother doing any research. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley referred a woman who accused Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh of rape to the Justice Department for making false statements and obstruction of justice. Kavanaugh, confirmed to the high court on Oct. 6, was infamously accused by multiple women of sexual assault and misconduct before the confirmation.

    Judy Munro-Leighton, according to Grassley’s office, “alleged that Justice Kavanaugh and a friend had raped her ‘several times each’ in the backseat of a car.”

    Those accusations were made via a "Jane Doe" letter provided to Sen. Kamala Harris, a California Democrat and committee member, Grassley’s office wrote. Upon further investigation, however, inconsistencies in the story emerged.

    Committee investigators quickly determined Ms. Munro-Leighton is a committed left-wing activist, is decades older than Judge Kavanaugh, and has always lived several hundred miles away from him. Bottom line here is that Ms. Munro-Leighton "lied". Something that has been well-established but the liberals continue to try to pass off as something that really happened.


     Let's not forget about the liar Anita Hill. 1. A witness said she was told details about the supposed sexual harassment while the two were living in Washington, except this witness was not living in Washington when Hill worked for Thomas. The witness supposedly corroborating Hills’ allegations had moved out of Washington before Hill even began working for Thomas. How could she have possibly been told about the harassment before it happened?

    2. Hill followed Thomas, a man she accused of sexual harassment, from job to job. Hill claimed that she feared to lose her government job if she did not follow Thomas from job to job. As Brookings Institute senior fellow Stuart Taylor Jr. points out, Hill was an employee of the federal government, known for its incredible job security.

    3. Hill made numerous phone calls to her supposed sexual harasser after she stopped working for him. Phone logs document numerous calls from Hill to Thomas after she stopped working for him. It seems rather odd that a woman would consistently call a man who sexually harassed her. Also, Hill initially denied that she made these calls — which doesn’t exactly boost her credibility either.

    4. Hill initially asked to be kept anonymous when her accusations were presented to Thomas. But if her accusations were true, then Thomas would know that the accusations were launched by Hill, so why ask for anonymity? Think about it: The accusations referred to things that were supposed to have happened when only two people were present. Anita Hill’s request for anonymity made sense only if the charges were false.

      5. Hill lied five times about being told something from a Democratic staffer, which she later admitted to under oath. Hill admitted, under oath, that although she previously denied being told something by a Democratic staffer, she actually was. This, of course, reeks of a political motive for the allegations and, again, a lack of credibility of the accuser.

     6. A dozen females who worked with Thomas and Hill gave favorable testimony about Thomas and refuted the claims by Hill of Thomas’ inappropriate behavior. A "dozen” women came out in support of Thomas, giving glowing testimony of his behavior, lending contradiction to Hills’ accusations. :)
      February 10, 2019 11:36 AM MST
    0