So your position is that what people say makes no difference as long as it is a "knee-jerk, emotional responses to something pertinent"---I find that a unique approach to discussing things.
And if one's facts are wrong, one can be both logical and wrong---syllogisms have rules regarding the nature of their component assumptions in order for their conclusions to be valid.
And of course, everybody claims to be a "logician."
And whether it will stand up to debate is no more than another opinion (for which I do not see a factual basis yet).