Which is better Moscow Mitch? The "Moscow" or the "Son of a"? No worries You are both simultaneously and will always be that. It is rock solid certain. No matter what you do to get it off your back you will be arriving too late to the party and no one will be remotely convinced that you give a sh**. You will never undo what you've already REFUSED TO DO Moscow! Never. Trust me. That I can tell you. Everyone says so! Real dumb doesn't come any dumber than Moscow Mitch.
Saying that wanting election protection from hostile foreign hacking is "PARTISAN" and would favor Dems?
Seriously! He has the chutzpah to say that and is so stupid dumb he doesn't even realize what a dumba** thing that is to the undumbs and nondumbs. He is pro hostile foreign nation intervention because it benefits his "party" and THAT ISN'T PARTISAN but wanting fair elections is? Who is so stupid dumb gullible and brain-dead as to believe that? Who will admit it?