Only evidence will sway my view, but sadly your video presents none. Second hand testimony about unauthenticated artifacts is not proof, only hand-picked confirmation bias
I’ve chased this fable for many years. While there may be someone’s blood on the Shroud of Turin, no DNA has been extracted, probably due to the age and degrading of the material, and no reliable DNA sample of Jesus exists, assuming he ever actually did. Add to the contamination of centuries of countless hands on the shroud itself.
The Ark of the Covenant was found? Really? Um, nope. Many Jewish theologians now admit this was likely a myth, a parable; because there is simply no proof Moses ever lived, or that the Exodus ever occurred. Whatever rests in that little chapel in Ethiopia, has not been examined at any length by any competent science.
Just gonna have to lift that bar of proof a bit higher before we start calling something “truth”.
This post was edited by Don Barzini at October 19, 2019 5:20 PM MDT
