Companies fold and are bought out. People move on to other jobs. Employees often stay and pray nothing significant will change. I know change will occur but should it always be at the expense of the employees? Should there be some change-sharing that goes on to give the employees some faith in their newly acquired company leaders or their new boss? I know bottom line profit matters to investors. But so too does being fair to the people there. Where is that line?
Sometimes.
For example, where I work the union contracts specifically state that any new owner is obligated to follow the contract until it expires. (3 year contracts)
However, a new owner would be under no obligation for non-contract employees.
If I were taking over a company, I would look at every person and job that isn't covered under a contract. Especially if the company had been failing. Maybe it's too "top heavy". Maybe there wasn't enough "discipline" for rule violations. Maybe there are jobs that could be automated or done more efficiently.