Discussion»Statements»Rosie's Corner» What woman has ever lusted after OIL the way men do? Does it enhance their manhood? A phallic symbol of virility? If not then WHAT?
It comes down to one thing. MONEY. Personal money for those who have it on their property. World wide economy for the countries who have it and those who buy it.
This post was edited by my2cents at October 26, 2019 10:37 AM MDT
How many wars are fought over oil sweetie? Serously! I mean it just makes no sense to me. Thank you for your reply m2c and Happy Sunday to thee. I guess I just don't have what it takes to be a mover and shaker! :)
Oil is power. Lust for power. Women are bred to find a man who lusts for power like Melania Trump. Why do you think I despise that retarded bimbo so much.
If it were just her, I could just despise her choice, but she BRED A SON. So that kid has no chance at being anything but daddy's spawn.
This post was edited by WM BARR . =ABSOLUTE TRASH at October 27, 2019 2:44 AM MDT
I do not get it Sharon. How many wars are based on wanting the oil in a country? I mean motormouth now sez the troops left in northern Syria are there to GUARD THE OIL! WHAT? Guard it against what for heaven's sakes? Sheesh! Thank you for your reply and Happy Sunday! :)
Oh, oh! That question could be read with double-entendre.
Leaving the adult answers aside...
Women are just as culpable. We drive cars and buy fuel. We buy products that have cost the earth by travelling halfway round the globe - the carbon footprint of the fuel burned for imported goods. We invest in stocks and shares that may include oil, plastics, nylon, petrochemical synthetics, detergents and mining exploration. By doing so we help to fuel at least half of men's drive for petroleum extraction and processing.
Has a woman ever started a war to gain control of the oil fields? The motormouth said the troops remaining in northern Syria are there TO GUARD THE OIL! From what? The double entendre is purposeful. I am serious. How many female leaders of countries have actively sought to engage in a war just to have the oil until her control? Thank you for your reply bw and Happy Sunday to you.
We haven't had too many leaders of powerful countries who were women. But among the few, Elizabeth the First cut down every oak tree in England to build the Armada to defeat the Spanish naval invasion. Not oil but legitimate self-defence - yet it shows how far a woman can go at need. Margaret Thatcher sent Great Britain to the Falklands to defend an island off the coast of Argentina as a naval base and military outpost. Given the dubious necessity to Britain and Argentina's obviously valid interest, I think her decision was questionable. I'm certain that if Thatcher had been in power at the time of the Gulf Wars, she would have sent British soldiers to fight for oil in Iraq just as readily as her male counterparts did. Conservative women can be just as ruthless as their menfolk when it comes to commercial interests.
The motormouth said the troops remaining in northern Syria are there TO GUARD THE OIL! We go to war over countries that have oil. We ignore countries that don't. That is the point of my question og. You are looking at it microscopically not macroscopically. Thank you for your reply and Happy Sunday.
my2cents 