Active Now

Element 99
Zack
Discussion » Statements » Rosie's Corner » Senator Kennedy said "no rebuttal evidence was allowed to be given" referring to Dr. Fiona Hill's testimony. How do you rebutt TRUTH?
RosieG

Senator Kennedy said "no rebuttal evidence was allowed to be given" referring to Dr. Fiona Hill's testimony. How do you rebutt TRUTH?

With lies of course.

So on the game goes with the Republican Senators who spout the Kremlin partyline propaganda. It was Ukraine they insist. Vlad Putin began floating that lie in 2016. His lapdogpuppet dementia don insists that all his toady sycophants repeat repeat repeat repeat repeat repeat repeat. They whimper cower grovel shiver roll over and obey.

A might fine sight for sore eyes. In unison now on the count of 3

"Ukraine did the meddling not Russia"

Vlad Putin smiles every time his script is repeated. Big smiles. Sincere smiles. Deeply felt joy at his puppetboylapdog who has come through as expected. The dementia don lapdogpuppet lives to service Putin another day in any and every way he can.

Touching. Heartwarming. The stuff dreams are made of.......

Posted - November 25, 2019
Tags : None

Responses


  • 46117
    I don't care what that jerk says.  He is like the BIGGEST joke ever.  They put him in the news just to show what an idiot he is with his remarks.  Never does he have a word to say that is not totally ridiculous.  He is a bad joke.  

    Have you EVER heard ONE quote from him that was not totally deranged?   The REAL Kennedys should sue him for denigrating their name.   This post was edited by WM BARR . =ABSOLUTE TRASH at November 25, 2019 6:34 AM MST
      November 25, 2019 6:33 AM MST
    1

  • 113301
    He is on tape years ago when he was a DEMOCRAT saying very kind things about another Democrat. So I have heard him say underanged words that are now frozen on tape. It has run on TV recently. Maybe you'll see it for yourself. Thank you for your reply and Happy Monday.
      November 25, 2019 6:36 AM MST
    1

  • 46117
    What he said was YEARS ago, not today.  Lindsey Graham said nice things too.  What difference does it make in the face of what they say now.  Screw them both.  They are disgusting animals with ZERO brains.  ZERO.  
      November 25, 2019 6:45 AM MST
    0

  • 113301
    You didn't give me a time limit Sharon. You said have you EVER heard and I told you I did. Did you forget the question YOU ASKED? So what's the problem? This post was edited by RosieG at November 25, 2019 6:50 AM MST
      November 25, 2019 6:49 AM MST
    0

  • 34815
    "Ukraine did the meddling not Russia"....the only person who said that was Schifty and others quoting him. 

    Republicans said both Russia and Ukraine meddled. 

    Fiona Hill: (01:05:04)

    Ukrainian government, again, they wouldn't have done very well at the [inaudible 00:32:11], I'm picking up the issue I pointed out at the beginning of today, they bet on the wrong horse.

     

    Fiona Hill: (01:05:15)

     

    They bet on Hillary Clinton winning the election. And so they were trying to carry favor with the Clinton campaign, it's quite evident here. And he relates to some extent, individuals and some Ukrainian officials like Mr. Avakov, the Interior Minister and a number of other people that he names here and that have been named at various points.

     

    ......

     

    So this is during the presidential campaign when President Trump was then the nominee for the Republican Party. And this is Ambassador Charlie who was then, still the Ukrainian ambassador to the United States being critical of President Trump, who was then the nominee for the Republican Party for making comments about Ukraine, Crimea and Russia.

     

    ..............many countries, including Ukraine, bet on the wrong horse. They believe that Secretary Clinton, former Senator Clinton, former First Lady Clinton was going to win. Many said some pretty disparaging and hurtful things about President Trump, and I can’t blame him for feeling aggrieved about them.

     

      November 25, 2019 7:00 AM MST
    0

  • 46117
    AMBASSADOR SONDLAND SAYS DIFFERENT.  SO DOES FIONA HILL.  SO DO THE OTHER TWO.  YOU ARE WRONG AND LYING AGAIN.  WHY DO YOU LIE??? YOU HAVE NO DEFENSE. THIS HAS BEEN DEBUNKED.  HILARY EMAILS HAVE BEEN DEBUNKED.   UKRAINE IS INNOCENT.  MR. GUILIANI IS GOING TO JAIL.  WAKE THE HECK UP ALREADY.  GOING TO JAIL 
      November 25, 2019 7:02 AM MST
    0

  • 34815
    Read my answer...it is direct quotes of Dr Hill. 
    Sonoland had one important testimony: What do you want from Ukraine?
    Trump: I WANT NOTHING. I WANT NOTHING. 

    The rest was what he "presumed." He was a dud for Schiffty. 
      November 25, 2019 7:09 AM MST
    0

  • 46117
    That's it.  You are right.  That's what happened.  Get real.

    Have you been awake the past 3 1/2 years?  

    Come on.   You are sleepwalking your answers.  I'm awake.  I am not going to waste time walking backwards.   Just so you can repeat what has been refuted  by Trump's liars.  The men who backed TRUMP? They are coming forward now.  Are you awake?  Did you watch what is going ON here?  Did you see that Trump's hand-picked people THE BEST PEOPLE are telling the TRUTH now?    

    And that TRUTH?  That truth is that there was QUID PRO QUO.  


    This post was edited by WM BARR . =ABSOLUTE TRASH at November 25, 2019 7:21 AM MST
      November 25, 2019 7:12 AM MST
    0

  • 34815
    So you do not believe Dr Hill or Ambassador Sonoland? 
      November 25, 2019 7:16 AM MST
    0

  • 46117
    I think that Ambassador Sondland and Fiona Hill are not on your side.  Once again you are writing before I finish. If you are going to do that?  I'm done.  You are not listening.  


      November 25, 2019 7:23 AM MST
    0

  • 34815
    I cannot predict when you are going to come back in 10 minutes and edit your post. 

    I gave you direct quotes. 
      November 25, 2019 7:32 AM MST
    0

  • 46117
    Direct quotes mean nothing when taken out of context.  I can give you direct quotes too.  What of it?  Then we can go back and forth all day long giving each other out of context direct quotes.

    I don't care about any quotes.  Direct or otherwise. I care about DIRECT IRREFUTABLE TESTIMONY.  AND YOUR SIDE HAS NO EVIDENCE TO PROVE THAT THE IRREFUTABLE TESTIMONY IS REFUTABLE.

    YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE TO REFUTE ANYBODY.   
      November 25, 2019 7:37 AM MST
    0

  • 34815
    My quotes are of their testimony. 
      November 25, 2019 7:40 AM MST
    0

  • 46117
    I did not read them.  AGAIN I do not care what you print.  It is out of context, okay?  I watched the whole thing, not the sentences I can use against you.  THE WHOLE THING IS SO DAMING TO TRUMP, I cannot believe he is still in that SEAT.  They should just take his fat lard butt out in handcuffs.   So, you can take quotes from someone like FIONA HILL, who has laid out perfectly what happened and say she is the reason you are right?   That is rich.  What are you going to try next?  Are you going to take quotes from Elizabeth Warren saying that TRUMP is innocent?  I am sure you could find a way to do even that if you are trying this one.  
      November 25, 2019 7:46 AM MST
    0

  • 34815
    How about quotes of her lying about her life? I am native American. I was chased by my boss. I was fired for being pregnant. My children did not go to private school. 
      November 26, 2019 5:41 PM MST
    0