Active Now

CosmicWunderkind
Discussion » Questions » answerMug » Hypothetically, what basically wouldn’t not really happen if you didn’t not actually reply to this question?

Hypothetically, what basically wouldn’t not really happen if you didn’t not actually reply to this question?


~

Posted - March 17, 2020

Responses


  • 44614
    ...wouldn't not, 'didn't not'...? Really.
    I am verklempt.
      March 17, 2020 8:49 PM MDT
    2

  • 17596
    I'm not not sure.  As usual.  ;)
      March 17, 2020 8:50 PM MDT
    3

  • 44614
    He's baiting you...as usual.
      March 17, 2020 8:52 PM MDT
    2

  • 53509

      Professor, you must think I'm on some kind of fishing expedition . . . hey, wait a second.



    ~
      March 17, 2020 10:37 PM MDT
    1

  • 13277
    Just this, my reply.
      March 17, 2020 8:54 PM MDT
    2

  • 4624
    I doubt anyone would notice if I didn't reply.
      March 17, 2020 9:34 PM MDT
    4

  • 17596
    You're wrong there.  :)
      March 17, 2020 9:43 PM MDT
    3

  • 53509
      March 17, 2020 9:53 PM MDT
    3

  • 4624
    Thank you, Thrifty -- and Randy. :)
      March 17, 2020 10:44 PM MDT
    4

  • 53509

      Bookworm, I don't not doubt that no one wouldn't not notice if you not only did not not reply, but if you did not reply only not answer and or not respond for not having had a negative rebuttal notwithstanding that which was not stood for no knowingly knowing no new or other query.
    ~
      March 17, 2020 10:32 PM MDT
    3

  • 4624
    Translation: 
    "I don't not doubt" = I doubt.
    "wouldn't not notice" = would notice
    ---> I doubt that no one would notice = I think someone would notice

    "did not not reply" = did reply

    "but   if you did not reply  /  only not answer /  and/or not respond"  --
    these three function as synonyms.
    They add up to "but if you didn't reply."

    The phrase "negative rebuttal" seems unclear. If it were intended as a double-negative it would imply the affirmative reinforcement of an argument.
    But, since rebuttal refers to the negating of an argument, I think in this instance it's better to deem the adjective "negative" as unnecessary. Let's discard the redundant descriptor.

    ---> "for not having had a negative rebuttal" = due to having no means of rebuttal 

    not stood = not proposed
    no knowingly knowing = not knowing

    Here, I transpose the word order: "not stood for no knowingly knowing"
    ---> knowingly not proposed.

    no new or other query = no query


    So, with a little tidying up, the final translation comes out as:

    I think someone would notice not only if you did reply
    but if you didn't (due to having no means of rebuttal), 
    despite the fact that the question knowingly posed no query.

    I'm enjoying your playful excesses of double-negatives twisting the meaning back upon itself like a convoluted python trying to mate with itself.

    It's kind of you, Randy, to propose that people notice the presence or absence of my replies.
    And it seems, from Thrifty's response, that you're not the only one to think so.

    It's taken a long time, due to long-standing insecurities, but I'm beginning to feel like I belong, like I'm a part of this sometimes surreal social landscape.

    Thank you. :)
      March 18, 2020 12:11 AM MDT
    2

  • 44614
    You two are driving me nuts.
      March 18, 2020 7:00 AM MDT
    2

  • 53509

      LOL, Bookworm, our plan is working perfectly!

      Don’t worry, Professor: she and I will be getting a room, and you won’t be subjected to our public displays of affection any longer. 


    ~
      March 18, 2020 7:21 AM MDT
    2

  • 44614
    Well then, don't not have an un-bad time.
      March 18, 2020 7:25 AM MDT
    1

  • 53509

      A great time will be had by all.




    ~
      March 18, 2020 7:27 AM MDT
    1

  • 4624
    Hey cutie, I thought you only ever flirted.
    I didn't believe you'd actually...

    I mean, we're both married, and gorgeous as you are, I think we're both too sensible to risk the risky path.

    We could, however, pretend - for the benefit of the amusement of others.
      March 18, 2020 8:21 PM MDT
    0

  • 53509


      Flight Attendant: “Ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard Quantas Airlines flight number 1234 departing from Los Angeles International and landing in Sydney, Australia . . . ”



    ~
      March 18, 2020 9:41 PM MDT
    0

  • 4624
    Great guffaws out loud, Ele. :D
      March 18, 2020 8:18 PM MDT
    2