Active Now

Kittigate
texasescimo
my2cents
Element 99
Baba
Nanoose
CosmicWunderkind
Discussion » Statements » Rosie's Corner » Why do men insist upon taking away a woman's right over her own body? Is it vicarous sex domination from dirty old men?

Why do men insist upon taking away a woman's right over her own body? Is it vicarous sex domination from dirty old men?

How would any man  love having women have complete control over what they can do or not do with their bodies?

You want a drug to counteract your impotence? Tough luck. Go suck an egg!

You want an operation so you stop making babies? Tough luck. Go suck an egg!

See how fun it is to be under the complete control of the opposite sex?Sheesh. What dummies the GOP male pols are. AS IF! The women who want to force other women to lose control over their bodies are TRAITORS TO  THEIR GENDER. Wannabe men? Girly men? Sheesh. .Get permission of hubby dearest for everything everytime all the time. No independent thought. Barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen or bedroom. That's all women are good for right? Welcome to 1950!

Well how about reciprocity. Women call the shots with respect to men and men call the shots with respect to women.

That will make for so many happycampers won't it?  You betchure bippy! What's a bippy?

Posted - October 13

Responses


  • 23168
    Because it is NOT just a woman's body.   There is another body inside. A living human being. And that child has the right to life to live.  The woman should have not right to kill anyone.  
      October 13, 2020 2:25 PM MDT
    0

  • 14309
    It is not a human being if it has no brain or heart and cannot live outside the womb.  It is a collection of cells.  
      October 13, 2020 10:29 PM MDT
    1

  • 11020
    Doctors have been observed suffocating babies in the case of late terminations. A humidicrib for a month or two and those little ones would be alive today.
      October 13, 2020 11:43 PM MDT
    2

  • 96503
    WHAT?
      October 14, 2020 4:13 AM MDT
    0

  • 11020
    https://eclj.org/abortion/hrc/the-human-rights-of-babies-surviving-late-abortion
      October 14, 2020 4:31 PM MDT
    2

  • 96503
    Thank you for the link R. What is your position on abortion? If a 14 year old child is raped and gets pregnant do you want her to give birth to a rapist's child? If the mother will die giving birth I guess it's okay if mom says it's okay. There is never a need for abortion if one is celibate or TAKES BIRTH CONTROL MEDS. But rape is never anticipated. Incest is something we don't talk about but I venture to say more than one daughter has given birth to her father's child. Disgusting. Whose life matters more? Why? Thank you for the link and Happy Thursday to thee and thine! :)
      October 15, 2020 2:12 AM MDT
    0

  • 11020
    Plan B, or an immediate D&C before conception can occur - police need a DNA sample to prove rape in any case. Nobody gets pregnant and the rapist goes to jail where he belongs, getting it up the butt brutally. Rock spiders rarely last long inside.
      October 15, 2020 5:05 AM MDT
    0

  • 14309
    I have never heard anything like that.
      October 14, 2020 9:39 AM MDT
    1

  • 96503
    :):):)
      October 15, 2020 2:12 AM MDT
    1

  • 96503
    :):):)
      October 14, 2020 4:14 AM MDT
    1

  • 23168
    Heart beats at 21 days after conception.
    Measurable brain waves as 6 weeks 2 days from conception. 
    Premature babies live outside of the mother. 

    Certainly not a blob of cells. 

    Interesting the repeatedly cloned cell from a 1970s abortion is a human baby tissue but all other babies are just a collection of cells.
      October 14, 2020 6:40 AM MDT
    0

  • 14309
    A 21 day old fetus or a 6 week old fetus could not live outside the mother.  Stop being ridiculous.

    The cloned cell is from a human, not an animal and unless you know how old the fetus was when the cell was harvested, you don't know it if it was a collection of cells or a baby.
      October 14, 2020 9:27 AM MDT
    0

  • 23168
    But they do have a beating heart and a brain.  They have been documented to feel pain at 20 weeks gestation. (18 weeks from conception)   Earliest preemie to live was 21 weeks. (19 weeks from conception)

    Kidneys begin to function at 14 week (12 weeks from conception)

    They have also been observed to move away from a touch to the their face at 6 week from conception. 

    So we have heart beat, brain waves, and sense of touch at 6 weeks from conception (8 weeks gestation).  How is this not a living human baby? This post was edited by my2cents at October 14, 2020 10:50 AM MDT
      October 14, 2020 10:00 AM MDT
    0

  • 14309
    Who has touched a 6-week old fetus's face?  One would have to invade the amniotic sac to do that.  How stupid do you think I am?
      October 14, 2020 12:33 PM MDT
    0

  • 23168
    The baby touches it own face.  And reflexively moves its head way and twists the rest of its body.  These movements are needed to help the joints and bones form correctly. 
    .............

    From her professional experience, Dr. Malloy explains that new technologies, such as the 4D ultrasound, show vivid images of babies kicking and moving in utero. That being said, she attests that a baby at just 8 weeks gestation can be seen moving in response to stimuli. By 20 weeks gestation, the baby will respond to sound and move, wince, and recoil from sharp objects and incisions. For instance, when sampling blood from the liver, the baby in utero will move away from the needle. 

      October 14, 2020 1:15 PM MDT
    0

  • 14309
    Reactions at 20 weeks is a far cry from what you claim is the reaction at 6 weeks.  This is what a 6-week fetus looks like:


    https://firsttimepregnancy.org/pregnancy-calendar-week-week/fetal-development-week-6/ This post was edited by SpunkySenior at October 14, 2020 10:03 PM MDT
      October 14, 2020 9:45 PM MDT
    0

  • 14309
    Why are you propping up your argument about 6 week old fetuses being able to do all kinds of things and then showing a video of a 24-week old fetus?  You lost the argument.
      October 14, 2020 10:12 PM MDT
    0

  • 23168
    What I posted was a Dr testifying to Congress that an 8 week gestation (6 week from conception) reacts to stimuli. 
    She says this at minute 2:30 in the video.  
    I also posted the text. 
    Also here is what a 6 week from conception (8 weeks gestation)
    baby looks like: 
      October 15, 2020 4:13 AM MDT
    0

  • 11020
    Little Samuel Armas quite definitely grasped the hand of the surgeon who closed his spina bifida lesion at 21 weeks gestation. Intrauterine surgery, it's rare but definitely possible - and viable pregnancies have been terminated later than that. It's a very famous picture, captioned "Hand of Hope".
      October 14, 2020 4:17 PM MDT
    2

  • 14309
    The example my2cents used was 6 weeks which is a far cry from the reaction a fetus would have at 21 weeks.  Wouldn't you agree?
      October 14, 2020 9:46 PM MDT
    0

  • 23168
    6 weeks from conception = 8 weeks gestation. 
    And as I posted the Dr testified she observed the babies responding to stimuli. 
      October 15, 2020 4:16 AM MDT
    0

  • 11020
    Contra isn't difficult, and there's Plan B if a rubber breaks, or in the case of sexual assault. A D&C within 24 hours, before conception occurs, is also an option - police will require a DNA sample to prove rape anyhow, and an immediate treatment while the vic is still in shock is infinitely preferable to an invasive and potentially dangerous surgical procedure that forces her to relive the trauma weeks or months later. The only excuse for a termination should be to save the mother's life, eg an ectopic pregnancy or an aggressive cancer requiring immediate heavy radiation and chemo.
    Don't want a baby? Don't get pregnant.
      October 13, 2020 11:41 PM MDT
    2

  • 96503
    The only two ways that is possible? TAKE BIRTH CONTROL PILLS OR STAY AWAY FROM SEX...BE CELIBATE. The pro life folks ARE AGAINST BIRTH CONTROL. Say that is the same thing as murdering. So what are you supposed to do?  There are dumba** dumbbells everywhere. They set up an impossible situation and then smack the crap out of those who don't lie down roll beg and play dead. Thank you for your reply R and Happy Thursday or Wesnesday as the case may be! :)
      October 14, 2020 4:17 AM MDT
    0

  • 23168
    No prolife people are not against birth control.  

    Some Catholics are against birth control. Because of a misunderstanding of a verse.  But most Prolife people are not Catholic. 
      October 14, 2020 6:00 AM MDT
    0