Which is Worse? A Man Who Talks Trash About Women, or a Woman Who Enables a Rapist?

People who talk trash about others are doing it to cover up their evil. That why people gossip about others. To destory them and building their self up. That sick way of building your self up. 

Hello again, AS:

Doesn't this get tiresome???  I tell you what he said, and you tell me what he meant...  After a while, seems like you'd get tired of that...  No, huh?

excon

No, you tell me what you choose to hear, I tell you what he actually said. Don't you ever get tired of smearing and misrepresenting? This post was edited by Benedict Arnold at October 16, 2016 8:52 AM MDT

There was evidence.  Here's the interview where she admits it's and laughs about it.

Sigh. OK this is getting tired but I'm all for the truth of things.

A)Hillary took that case on as a favor to the prosecutor. She wasn't "made" to do it.

B)Hillary lied about the rape victim at 12 years old. There was hospital evidence that she was a virgin before the rape. Despite this Hillary had in court claimed that the 12 year old had rape fantasies and liked older men (but Hillary presented no witnesses.) I can dig up ACTUAL court testimony because it's all free online.

C)Hillary had the evidence of the rapist's underwear which had blood and semen on it brought into INDEPENDENT TESTING and had to pull a lot of strings for it to be there I can also back this up FYI. By the time the "independent testers" got done independently testing.. their underwear was so cut up it wasn't admissible in court.

D)Hillary ON TAPE said that she knew that there was ACTUAL EVIDENCE that could have convinced the rapist. That the prosecutor knew 100% that this guy actually did it based on solid evidence. But because this was the late 1970s it was much easier to do what Hillary did especially knowing the people she already knew. When Hillary was done the guy only spent a few months in jail because of it.

E)You are welcome. If anyone would like extra links to back my statements up please do so I will happily prove it. THANKS.

Spot on.  I have argued all these same points in other places, but fully agree.

ROTFLMAO!

Lovely meme... What are you saying..? It's okay to assault women simply because of their appearances..?

I know right! And nope but I'll let you think that. You know how this works as well I do. You imply something so far off base. I write three paragraphs explaining it and you either ignore it or skip it entirely and focus on one sentence. Not doing it :)

Hmm. Somewhat like posting such memes first place... Yea I get that part... Thought provoking, but only among your own. Take good care.

"Only among my own" hmm see? I knew you (because frankly your group seems to operate in a similar manner) don't actually ask questions because you want to know.. you only ask them to imply accusations. In reality you think you already have it all figured out.

LOL. Don't worry you sure got me... you are SO smart. You win a gold star. Have a good day Miss.

You are sure a funny character. I don't operate in group. I did ask a question because I wanted to know if you think it's okay to assault women because of their appearance as your meme suggests. Of course I would have followed up with a further question based on what you had to say. Guess a no reply is a reply too. You won't want to discuss the matter. Make your usual excuses why you won't reply.

Keep the gold star and the being SO smart for yourself. You have deserved them.

Yeah you told me I operate in a group "only among my own" so you can assume to know who I am but I not you?

Make your usual excuses why you won't reply.

Yet strangely you hardly talk to me so I don't know what "usual excuses" I could give to you, that's laughable that you sort of just straight up lie like that and then expect me to take you seriously. By the way I have always given thoughtful answers to only be ignored or misrepresented on purpose. So what is the point? Just so that you can bait with questions that are actually not really questions at all? Think whatever you want to Miss.

It's because I don't really think the meme is representing assault (how you got assault I have no idea.) I am a woman and have gotten assaulted myself why would I post a meme condoning assault? You get one thing and I get another.

I think it represents a double standard though. If you say you want to be respected being a woman and that women shouldn't be exploited.. why are they on stage exploiting themselves? Hollywood is ALL ABOUT sex. I think it presents a double standard so much that it changes our perception based on who we talk to or who they are. If people were brutally honest humanity would have never survived :)

The meme brought in the context you do will make such assumptions. You don't need to have replied to me before for me to have noticed your usual way of excuses not to respond, but to make the others look like they have an agenda whereas you have none. Keep making all your speeches about my person instead of the topic. 

I just responded about the meme if you didn't get it? Like I said I am a woman and have gotten assaulted myself. I didn't mean it in that way (but I know you are going to think that so go ahead it's OK.) I meant it more to show a double standard... assault is implying action. How does the meme imply action? I never got that and it didn't come to my mind one bit.

And by saying I've come up with excuses from past observations by you... that means you've seen my responses you would know that's not true. I write LENGTHY responses every single time. The only thing that gets distorted is people assuming to know MY political stance and/or taking things way out of context therefore I'm sure you are smart enough to know how distorted conversations actually get the further away the subject it gets.

I do sincerely apologize if that wasn't your original intent but when you imply you obviously don't like my past comments (to whom or what I don't know) I think it still implies that you are commenting when bias. If I am wrong let me know.