Discussion » Statements » Rosie's Corner » They need no PROOF EVIDENCE FACTS. All they need to BELIEVE is to hear duck say every day MASSIVE FRAUD MASSIVE FRAUD. Simple no?
RosieG

They need no PROOF EVIDENCE FACTS. All they need to BELIEVE is to hear duck say every day MASSIVE FRAUD MASSIVE FRAUD. Simple no?

Every day duck keeps reprogramming the base lest they get otherwise involved.

MASSIVE FRAUD
MASSIVE FRAUD
MASSIVE FRAUD


They will go to the their final destination believing that PROVIDING THAT THE DUCK KEEP REPROGRAMMING THE SPACE IN THEIR  HEADS WHERE OTHERS HAVE MINDS OF THEIR OWN.

MASSIVE FRAUD MASSIVE FRAUD MASSIVE FRAUD MASSIVE MASSIVE FRAUD FRAUD


Who needs truth when you have a duck?

Posted - December 3, 2020
Tags : None

Responses


  • 34266
    There are hundreds of people who have testified under oath with a penalty of up to 5yrs in prison.  

    They personally witnessed fraud.  Some admitted to committing fraud under direction of the person in charge of the election in the precinct. The lady even has the instructor on audio recording. (with permission of the instructor)   

    We have video evidence of them blocking the view of observers.  You do not block the view if what you are doing it correct and legal.  

    There is also statistical analysis that does not support a Biden win. 

    We know there are people whos birthdays are incorrect in the system.  As 1/1/1900 and 1/1/2020.  

    There is even evidence of weighted votes.  (ie.  Biden votes counts as 1.3 and Trump vote counts as .7)   Vote reports should never have decimals.  Votes are always a whole number.  

    Computers need confiscated and an forensic audit needs done. 
      December 3, 2020 11:39 AM MST
    1

  • 2706
    I agree. There's definite proof of fraud. What's interesting though is the high number of people who, not only have a tendency to ignore this proof but how they go out of their way to shut it down while ignoring it. This post was edited by rusureamisure? at December 4, 2020 6:28 AM MST
      December 3, 2020 8:07 PM MST
    2

  • 34266
    Yep. Just let a unbiased party forentically examine the machines.  And explain the birth dates etc. 
      December 3, 2020 8:38 PM MST
    1

  • 2706
    That's a good idea. I'm thinking though, the authors of this fraud will go out of their way to try to keep that from happening.
      December 4, 2020 5:50 AM MST
    1

  • 16772
    Not only is there no "proof", there's not even any EVIDENCE. There have been a few minor errors, none sufficient to change the result and as many in Trump's favour as otherwise.

      December 4, 2020 2:46 AM MST
    1

  • 113301
    Correct as usual m'dear but you see they have no need for reality truth justice. None. It cramps their style. So it all falls on deaf ears. Like talking to a brick wall or a sea of mud or quicksand. Thank you for your reply R. The reason duck keeps at this is so far he has collected $170 million from the adoring worshippers for his fund to fight the election fraud. He admits there was no fraud and the money dries up. So you see he has no choice. Sigh.:(
      December 4, 2020 3:24 AM MST
    0