I don't understand why anybody would suport Hillary. She's an embarrassment!

I hope you are wrong, Hillary is perhaps more suited for a straight jacket than the oval office. She's given her soul up to greed. I don't know if there is a limit to what she would do for power and money. That's what her life is and that's what she has dedicated her entire life to and God have mercy on what ever gets in her way, including family.

Understand. I don't like Hillary--a LOT. She's a political opportunist with the scruples of an alley cat. She eats her husband's victims for lunch while simultaneously delighting in the occasional (mixed-gender if rumors are accurate) tryst herself.  She has a list of 'suicided' opponents as long as her arm AND she's positively outstanding at getting people (mainly diplomatic staff) killed.

But, loathsome as the idea may be, she WILL be our next president.  Even if she doesn't win the popular election (which will be tabulated by the corporations who are friendly to her), she'll win the electoral college--prolly by the biggest landslide since Nixon-McGovern. Prepare now.  I mean it.

I'm prepared. No matter what anyone says about her, her winning will be a much better outcome than the alternative. Don't forget, we elected that crook Nixon twice.

Whose this 'we,' pal? :-)  I wasn't even a gleam in my daddy's eye when that atrocity was committed.

We as in the USA. I was 8 and 12 when he was elected.

You sir are so wrong it's actually scarey. I think you have allowed mainstream media to program you. You need to step back and research her and trump. Her corruption has no limits, but lets put that to the side for a minute and look at something else. I'm sure you won't do it because you don't want to know the truth, google refugee's in Europe and look at the mess the mainstream media won't air for reasons I don't understand. If Hillory brings 600,000 refugee's over here we will be screwed. We are so far in debt that we will never get out if we don't get somebody that understands business. I tell you this, Hillory is a pathological liar, you can check a gov. web site and I don't recall which one it was but you can find it fairly easy, Bill never, ever, never had a surplus as president and there will never be one with Hillory. But back to the refugee problem, I think it's safe to say they will bring very little as far as providing for themselves. What that means is they will automatically get, food stamps, medical and I think it's safe to say a lot of them will need medical attention. Housing, the majority will be homeless. Special schools, dental attention, clothes, transportation and many more. This will also effect taxes in as much as Americans will lose jobs and the refugee's will probably not have to pay taxes. With Hillory offering free college for any body that crosses the border along with all that other crap she says she's going to be giving away, you figure that out, does she have some kind of magic beans that leads to golden gooses, the government can't give anything away that they don't take from some body else that worked for it. We're at a point where we're having a hard time taking care of our selves, I my self do not want to be a slave to some piece of crap that hates me who shouts death to Americans. They're mission is to take the world over, which many have admitted. They are beheading Christians and any other that don't follow they're ways. You can expect a lot more attacks of terrorism and chaos. That by itself should have you rethink voting for Hillory. How about how she back peddles such as gun control, I think she was clearly talking about a major attack on the 2nd amendment and did you hear what she said about it a week ago, she meant toddlers, she don't think toddlers shouldn't have any gun rights. Dude, voting for somebody that admits she short circuits is in no way a good idea and voting for her will be the biggest mistake you will ever make, I mean unless you hate America.

No, you're the one who's been programmed - too much Breitbart, Drudge, and Fox News have fried your brain. The fact is that the right put itself and you in the position of having to deal with Hillary Clinton as your next president with all its extreme anti-Obama rhetoric and legislative obstruction over the last 8 years.

Read the following and weep. President Obama warned the right and now it's coming back in their collective face - https://newrepublic.com/article/138114/obama-right-republican-extremism-along

I hope your wrong dude, every promise she's made was  lies. There is no way she can bring in 100's of 1000's of muslims and give them free classes at Yale. So now because she lost supporters over her talk of gun control she's switched sides and said she was talking about keeping toddlers from owning guns and not grown ups. I hope your not thinking about voting for that creature.

I'm not wrong - just look at the numbers - http://www.realclearpolitics.com. It could be a landslide. And BTW, check your facts - nobody advocates free tuition at Yale or other private universities. And nobody's a creature. I will vote for her because she's much more qualified and suited than Trump to be president - it's not even close. If you don't like the idea of her becoming President Clinton, blame the GOP for nominating a narcissistic, misogynistic demagogue and hope they do a better job in 2020. This post was edited by Stu Spelling Bee at October 23, 2016 11:24 AM MDT

Right.  Trump talks trash about women. Hillary lies, gets people killed, has complete disregard for the law and an equivalent contempt for the American people...but again, you're right. She will be the next prez.  Americans' self loathing is THAT intense.

It's really the Republican Party's fault. A stronger candidate, perhaps Kasich or Rubio, might have wiped the floor with Hillary. They shot themselves in the foot and handed the presidency to her by nominating Trump. It may also cost them control of the Senate and/or the House.

Correct. All counts.  America's self-loathing still accounts for the popularity of Clinton.

"Why in the world do you continue to bring these things up? THEY'VE BEEN ANSWERED !!"

Because they have NOT been 'answered' to anyone's satisfaction (except, possibly, her media and business lackeys and the moroons who support her). Questions REMAIN as to her:

Blithering incompetence in Libya and Iraq

Personal vendettas on the women who were courageous enough to call her husband on his misogynistic and, in a few cases, flatly illegal behavior

Contempt of the law in regard to her private email server, documents relating to her activities at the Rose Law Firm and various shady dealings from her days in Mina, Arkansas

Contempt for Whitehouse staff (e.g., secret service personnel and the Whitehouse Travel Office)

Contempt for at least HALF of the American people--i.e., those 'irredeemable' individuals who dare take issue with her unbridled malevolence.  You know, the ones who belong in the "basket of deplorables"?

Edit: here's the Big List. Get comfy. It's gonna take you a while to read it:
http://www.wnd.com/2016/07/above-the-law-hillarys-huge-scandal-list-explodes-to-25/


This post was edited by Transquesta at October 23, 2016 8:10 AM MDT

I don't think a website that hasn't yet dropped "birtherism" has any credibility among either Republicans or Democrats or Independents.

As for the other comments you made, they have been hashed and rehashed and I don't intend to do more hashing at your request. If the anti-Clinton people had used their considerable energies in finding a suitable candidate to run against her, there would be little need to criticize Hillary Clinton. You've heated your soup, now drink it. 

One last revealing comment about how you see "facts" - the "basket of deplorables" was hardly "...at least HALF of the American people". I'll leave you to work that one out.

1) Either the data/information at the site is correct or it is not. If you dispute it's accuracy, dispute it on/by facts alone.  Deriding the site/source is a common, tired canard of both sides.

2) I'm not a repugnican.  I think the repugnican party base took complete leave of their senses when they picked this a$$ clown. I didn't 'heat' this 'soup,' IOW.  Try again. ;-)

3) The point remains: attacking the voters is a no-no regardless of the percentages.

I agree with #3. It was probably the stupidest thing she did. Politics 101.

I think "birtherism" is an excellent way to gauge the veracity of a website. An obvious lie in one thing indicates probable lies in other things.

"Misrepresentation" is probably a better word then "lie". After all, they may actually believe birtherism, which is even more indicative of a skewed mind-set than an outright lie.

I do not intend to argue the facts of that site - it's already been done. If there is still a need to see rebuttals, Google to your heart's content. It's all there waiting for you.
   

1) See? If we try, people of all political stripes can find common ground. :-)

2) Careful.  "Birtherism" was hatched by the HRC campaign when she was vying for top slot against Obama.  This is an established historical fact.  That conswervatives ran with the opportunity which democrats gave them is only natural.


3) I'm no fan of WND myself.  They used to be an excellent alternative news site/source. Now they're an ad mill/bug zapper for the stupid.  The list, though, was a) the first one that popped up in a search (i.e., "big list hillary clinton"), and b) by no means the only source available. To wit:

4) Indeed it is!  IF you're adventurous enough. :-)

Addendum:

Ask Bernie Sanders supporters whether any of these charges (INCLUDING election rigging!) have been answered to their satisfaction.

TLDR?

TLDR = Too long, didn't read.