Active Now

Shuhak
Discussion » Questions » Politics » Even if you AGREE with banks/rich, that hillary should be president, aren't you embarrassed about it? Don't you wonder what they want?
ITpro

Even if you AGREE with banks/rich, that hillary should be president, aren't you embarrassed about it? Don't you wonder what they want?

Why do the banks and the rich people prop up hillary? They donate to her campaign and the banks pay her directly millions of dollars in speaking fees.  She tells them she's sorry about the regulations that are just there to make the dumb public feel better.

Posted - October 24, 2016
Tags : None

Responses


  • 5614
    Hillary is predictable. Trump is not.
      October 24, 2016 4:31 PM MDT
    0

  • 46117
    I was told I can say ASS--- and talking out of it you are.

    This post was edited by WM BARR . =ABSOLUTE TRASH at October 24, 2016 4:35 PM MDT
      October 24, 2016 4:33 PM MDT
    0

  • 691
    Are you saying that banks do not financially support the hillary campaign and the clinton foundation and have also paid her millions in speaking fees?  Have you read the speeches she has given? Or did she convince you that you should not read those speeches because russian hackers with big hats made them up?  If the speeches were fake why did she defend one at the debate?
      October 24, 2016 4:36 PM MDT
    1

  • 46117
    I'm SAYING that she is NOT Donald Trump and you should be really embarrassed.  This is true overkill to cover your idol.

    Let them pay her.  Who gives a rat's patootie.  Good for her.  I don't read anyone's speeches.  I have a life.  I will go by what she does in office.  We will have a whole lot of Hilldog soon enough to judge.

    This post was edited by WM BARR . =ABSOLUTE TRASH at October 24, 2016 4:40 PM MDT
      October 24, 2016 4:40 PM MDT
    0

  • 691
    But she has held office for many years so do you expect her to be a new honest woman or will it be more of same?
      October 24, 2016 5:02 PM MDT
    0

  • 2500
    Stop trying to confuse the Hil-LIAR-y supporters with facts!
      October 24, 2016 4:40 PM MDT
    0

  • 3191
    CNN told viewers it is illegal for us to read anything from wikileaks, but not the media...so we should all just listen to their spin on it all.  Smh

      October 24, 2016 4:50 PM MDT
    1

  • 2500
    What a load of bullcrap from the likes of Chicken Noodle News. "The Media" has no more "right" to possess classified government documents than does anyone else.

    But given the pass that the FBI gave Hil-LIAR-y on her sharing tons of classified materials I'm not even sure that possession of materials classified even as highly as "Top Secret - Nuclear" is illegal anymore, especially now that they're in the public domain. 
      October 24, 2016 4:58 PM MDT
    0

  • 691
    CNN made a mistake with that because they accidentally admitted that such information were real documents. Obviously anyone could possess fake documents that putin wrote himself while riding a bear.
      October 24, 2016 5:03 PM MDT
    0

  • 3191
    Agreed.  You did catch the "Smh" in my post, didn't you?
      October 24, 2016 5:04 PM MDT
    0

  • 2500
    Sorry, thought I clicked on the "Like" button for your comment. I know that we're on the same page.
      October 24, 2016 9:50 PM MDT
    1

  • 3191
    I wasn't concerned about the like...just did not want it thought that I agreed with CNN.  :)
      October 24, 2016 9:55 PM MDT
    0