I understand that there is a process for flagging content and letting admin/mod's review, clear, or remove, with an email sent to the OP if removed or edited. Am I missing a process here? This seems like a witch hunt mentality, instead of following the proper channels. 

My suggestion instead of trying "to help JA", is to simply present your concern to her and let her decide, if even to put up for a member vote. Seems to me that JA is very involved and will address your concerns, whether to your satisfaction or not. I see a total disrespect in trying to hardball JA into making a decision based on a public presentation like this. People always like to complain when censorship is placed, until it is for their own cause. Unless it is clearly defined in ToS, I'm sure JA will review. I am not condoning any groups in question, simply the presentation.  

If you don't like a question, pass by it. 

I chanced upon but read this thread for a reason.

Madonna was slated by various feminist groups who failed to see that Hanky Spanky was about consensual play-spanking between adults. They thought, wrongly, that it condoned domestic violence. Now, like Madonna and apparently WingedWonder, I enjoy the play version but I am very uneasy about the so-called "Domestic Discipline" scene with its bizarre "Head of Household" nonsense (usually the husband, but not always, and sometimes given the sort of Hebrew Bronze-Age tribal "justification" WW alluded to earlier), and that's between consenting(?) adults.

Once I found a web-site whose title implied erotic CP games, but I was horrified to find it a malevolently sanctimonious child-cruelty-fest; a veritable www -Pro-Spanking Parents-dot- ". I do visit AM's "Spanked at..." forums (I wish Microsoft would allow correct Graeco-Latin plurals!) but that is for adults telling other adults what was done to them - and I shy away from the worst accounts of mindless cruelty by thick teachers and parents who resented their loin-fruits' very existence. However, I do not and would not touch "Pro-spanking" with a barge-mouse. I have no children but if I did, I would not have spanked them, let alone battered them with belts, sticks, shoes, bits of timber etc. then sanctimoniously boasted about it being "discipline" or claim "rights" by spurious Bible stories. Besides, I don't want traces of their paederastic material in the depths of my computer.  

My reason was others' views on it. For I was among complainants who had two users removed from a British adult-spanking web-site for involving their children in their own profiles. One was a man who admitted severely beating his teenage daughters; the other a woman who wanted to be spanked strongly hinted at involving her 12yo girl. In the UK at least, anyone they met who joined in as implied would probably end up in jail and on the Sex Offenders Register.

In fact if AM was based in Britain, it's quite possible that the Law, not just we users or the site's owner, would ban the Pro-spanking forum.     

As the English contact-mag ITC (their bold font) has it, spanking fun is for adults only; and its proprietors state they actively condemn real physical punishment of anyone, not just children.

Thankyou for the likes, Winged Wonder & SapphicHeart.

This post was edited by Benedict Arnold at November 3, 2016 6:44 PM MDT

It looks like the description on this question changed. Inappropriate content should not be reposted ever. There are report buttons on every piece of content that can be used or links can be sent to me via email or the feedback tab.

That's right.  Everyone who doesn't agree with you needs to be kicked off the site.  What is wrong with people?  I fully support the right of parents to incorporate corporal punishment into their system of discipline.  Spanking is not abuse. 

i havent seen them around but i dont think they belong here either