I was completely unaware of it until reading it here; thank you for passing it along. After reading it, in my opinion the story has has so many non-agenda or anti-agenda elements to it that there absolutely no way the slanted and biased media giants allowed its dissemination. The ethnicity of both the criminal and the heroine, their genders, their age groups, the locale, the event, the methods in which each acquired a firearm, the types of weapons each had, the lack of numerous dead or injured victims, many other factors all combine to make it a non-story, a non-sensationalizable story. I also wonder where the so-called “Black Lives Matter” movement is on the issue of this man making his conscious decision to attempt to hurt or kill other human beings.
I offer kudos to the woman for her actions in stopping the threat and for doing something that averted injury or death of innocents. Undoubtedly she will undergo or has already begun to undergo mixed emotions about the incident, and I hope the most negative of those are diminished as much as possible.
:(
P. S. That errant comma after the surname Butler drives me crazy. I know you didn’t write it yourself, though. It still bugs me anyway. Grrrrrrr.
Danilo_G 