An election case, actually hearing evidence...Live Link below.

Link to today's testimony

https://rumble.com/v2oh4js-live-day-two-kari-lake-returns-to-court-to-challenge-election-results-may-1.html

I do not believe anything will be overturned either. But it will expose things for laws to be passed to strength election integrity laws/rules.

Only sore losers, led by Trump, allege that there are any such issues. It’s really much ado about nothing.

Traditionally, losers of election graciously concede and congratulate the winner. Trump being unable to do that says more about flaws in his character than about any election laws or processes. Apparently, Kari Lake is a similar kind of person.

Really,when did Hillary graciously concede and congratulate Trump?  

You concede when you agree that you lost, not when you believe there was fraud or possible miss count.

She conceded the morning after the election.

Trump clearly used fraud as an excuse for his ego not allowing him to be a gracious loser and concede for the good of the country. It was more important for him to remain in power than to put his country first and ensure a peaceful transition of power.

The 2000 election was much closer with a more questionable result, but Al Gore eventually quit fighting it and conceded so the country could agree that Bush won and unify behind him.

Unlike Trump, he put the country ahead of his ego and desire to win.

Hillary was still claiming 2016 was stolen from her as late as 2020....I know that is (D)ifferent. 

Again, it is about election integrity,  all Americans should have confidence in the results of our elections.  And too many do not right now....that needs fixed.

Fraud and election integrity were Trump’s excuses for being a sore loser. I don’t expect you to admit that to yourself or anyone else. This post was edited by Stu Spelling Bee at May 19, 2023 7:40 AM MDT

No, there was and is legitimate questions about results in specific states.  You choice not to look at the evidence...but that does not mean it does not exist.  

If the fraud did not happen, the the laws preventing the alleged fraud will be of no effect because it did not happen.  

Trump’s excuse. But  as I said, I don’t expect you to acknowledge it.

No, not just Trump....many organizations fighting fraud are involved as well.  

https://hereistheevidence.com

This post was edited by my2cents at May 19, 2023 11:34 AM MDT

Of course you would say that. As I said, I don’t expect you to acknowledge what the rest of us see.

Not when others refuse to even look at the evidence. This post was edited by my2cents at May 20, 2023 4:34 AM MDT

The real "crime" regarding the election (apart from Jan 6 which according to the Fourteenth ABSOLUTELY disqualifies him from running again) is his attempt to put a hammer lock on Raffensperger. There's no argument there, it was 100-proof, clear quill gum fraudulent behaviour.

Nope. Nothing wrong with that call.  Trump believed with good reasons that there was fraud and told Raffensperger to find it.  

Jan6th was a setup. There is a reason they denied NG offers...they wanted to stop the objections.  That is what was stopped,  not the certification but the objections.   Who benefited ?  The Dems. 

Wrong, he told Raffensperger to find extra votes for him that didn't exist - in effect, to falsify the returns.

He told him to find the votes because he believed fraud had taken place.  It did, it is on video.