Discussion » Questions » Politics » Do you think Trump will be throwing out the red meat on Truth Social tonight?
Nanoose

Do you think Trump will be throwing out the red meat on Truth Social tonight?

Kilmar Abrego Grarcia is now out of prison and with his family.

If you forgot who he is – here is a recap of what Trump did to him and his family.

Garcia was illegally deported - Then Trump said something like – oh well he is in El Salvador now so it is out my hands – Trump suggested to the El Salvador president that he will have to build more prison to hold all the people he is going to send over. There was also something about a smiley face tattoo that Trump claimed - proved Garcia was a vicious gang member.
But after all that I’m sure Trump will throw out a little red meat on Truth Social and put Garcia and his family in danger.
Cheers and happy weekend!

Posted - August 23
Tags : None

Responses


  • 11943
    Maybe, but he might have too much on his hands right now. He just extorted a 10% share of Intel for the government making it the largest shareholder.  I thought a government takeover of a company was communism or maybe socialism,  so I'm very confused as to why the right would endorse such a move.
      August 23, 2025 8:23 PM MDT
    1

  • 35576
    Same thing that Obama did with the automakers.  But this is with computer chips.  

    Ni, I do not now nor did I like it then.  Company should not get bailouts from the gov.
      August 25, 2025 5:10 AM MDT
    0

  • 11943
    Not the same thing at all but I'm not going to waste my time trying to educate you. Also, there are two sides to bailouts, pros and cons, but again that's up to you if you want to learn about it. This is not an invitation to argue do any reply will be disregarded. 
      August 25, 2025 5:28 AM MDT
    0

  • 35576
    It is the same US money for a company to stay in business in the US.  And instead of free money stocks are being required. US has no voting power on the board etc.  
      August 25, 2025 5:47 AM MDT
    0

  • 4762
    Intel put out a statement regarding this investment by the government.  While it id say that th U.S. share is 9.9%, it didn't say whether that makes the U.S. its largest shareholder.  

    "The government’s investment in Intel will be a passive ownership, with no Board representation or other governance or information rights. The government also agrees to vote with the Company’s Board of Directors on matters requiring shareholder approval, with limited exceptions."

    https://www.intc.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/1748/intel-and-trump-administration-reach-historic-agreement-to

    It would appear that the government's influence in the management of the company is limited.  Having said that, I'm sure that Trump will do his best to somehow create a situation where he winds up owning the shares.  
      August 24, 2025 1:07 AM MDT
    0

  • 11943
    I re-checked. Some sources say it's the largest shareholder, but others say it's the third largest, with the top shareholder having 13%.  I haven't got the expertise to know what this means, but it does seem like a Communist or Socialist move.
      August 24, 2025 7:04 AM MDT
    1

  • 4762
    I'm not quite sure what all this means either, but the government owning any percentage of shares in a large public company doesn't sound kosher to me either.   
      August 24, 2025 8:34 AM MDT
    1

  • 35576
    You forgot to mention he beat his wife, and is involved in human trafficking of both adults and children. 

    He should have been deported to Eygpt or Nicaragua.  That was the "illegal" part of the deportation,  he was a gang member worried about RIVAL gang retaliation in El Salavador, so a judge had given him protection from repatriation to El Salavador.  
      August 24, 2025 6:22 AM MDT
    0