Active Now

Element 99
Discussion » Questions » Animals (Wild) » A few centuries ago, it was common for people to die very young, in their 20's. Now we live to be 80 and beyond, no problem. Can we do this with our dogs and cats? Can we feed them better?

A few centuries ago, it was common for people to die very young, in their 20's. Now we live to be 80 and beyond, no problem. Can we do this with our dogs and cats? Can we feed them better?

How do we increase their life span?  Is it possible?

Posted - July 4, 2016

Responses


  • I would be surprised if dogs and cats lived to 15-20 years at the time humans were dying in their 20s and 30s.

      July 4, 2016 10:03 AM MDT
    0

  • 1113

    It's still common for people to die in their 20's. But it's been tens of thousands, or maybe hundreds of thousands of years since people's average lifespan was in the 20's.

      July 4, 2016 10:50 AM MDT
    0

  • 5354

    @"it was common for people to die very young, in their 20's."

    Sorry Sharonna, but that is not correct and never was.

    What was common was for babies to die shortly after being born. and that was very common. So common it brought the average lifespan down to something like 27 years. But is was never "common to die in their 20es", A lot of people lived longer, into their 60es of 70es. And a bigger lot lived much shorter, so short they never got to see a single birthday cake.

    It have changed now, but not because people have changed in some way. It is about hygiene, nutrition, and all the nurses that visit people with a baby and give them good advice (about hygiene and nutrition).

    3 score and 10 is the Natural lifespan of humans. for cats and dogs it is much less. We would need a lot of genetic enginering to make them live as long as we do. You could take an elephant for a pet, The have about the same natural lifespan as we do. But be warned, they eat a lot and are hard to housebreak.

      July 4, 2016 11:09 AM MDT
    0

  • 46117

    Well, that is an excellent point, Char.  One of their years is like 7 of ours.  So, that is a very good point to  consider.  Thanks.

      July 4, 2016 11:13 AM MDT
    0

  • 46117

    Where do you get your information?  We are both off the mark, it seems. 

    If a child survived to age 10, life expectancy was an additional 37.5 years, (total age 47.5 years).[17]
    Pre-Columbian North America[18] 25–30  
    Medieval Islamic Caliphate[19] 35+ Average lifespan of scholars was 59–84.3 years in the Middle East[20][21] and 69–75 in Islamic Spain.[22]
    Late medieval English peerage[23][24] 30 At age 21, life expectancy was an additional 43 years (total age 64).[25] 
    Early Modern England[14] 33–40
    1900 world average[26] 31  
    1950 world average[26] 48  
    2010 world average[27] 67.2

    Life expectancy increases with age as the individual survives the higher mortality rates associated with childhood. For instance, the table above listed the life expectancy at birth among 13th-century English nobles at 30. Having survived until the age of 21, a male member of the English aristocracy in this period could expect to live:[25]

    • 1200–1300: to age 64
    • 1300–1400: to age 45 (because of the bubonic plague)
    • 1400–1500: to age 69
    • 1500–1550: to age 71

    17th-century English life expectancy was only about 35 years, largely because infant and child mortality remained high. Life expectancy was under 25 years in the early Colony of Virginia,[28] and in seventeenth-century New England, about 40 per cent died before reaching adulthood.[29] During the Industrial Revolution, the life expectancy of children increased dramatically.[30] The under-5 mortality rate in London decreased from 745 in 1730–1749 to 318 in 1810–1829.[31][32]

    Public health measures are credited with much of the recent increase in life expectancy. During the 20th century, despite a brief drop due to the 1918 flu pandemic[33] starting around that time the average lifespan in the United States increased by more than 30 years, of which 25 years can be attributed to advances in public health.[34]

    Further information: Longevity

    Regional variations[edit]

      >80
      77.5-80
      75-77.5
      72.5-75
      70-72.5
      67.5-70
      65-67.5
      60-65
      55-60
      50-55
      45-50
      40-45
      <40
    Plot of life expectancy vs. GDP per capita in 2009. This particular phenomenon is known as the Preston curve.
    Graphs of life expectancy at birth for some sub-Saharan countries showing the fall in the 1990s primarily due to the AIDS pandemic.[35]

    There are great variations in life expectancy between different parts of the world, mostly caused by differences in public health, medical care, and diet. The impact of AIDS on life expectancy is particularly notable in many African countries. According to projections made by the United Nations (UN) in 2002, the life expectancy at birth for 2010–2015 (if HIV/AIDS did not exist) would have been:[36]

      July 4, 2016 11:14 AM MDT
    0

  • 46117

    Jakob

    You right.  Me off the mark. 

    Thanks.  See what I posted above you.   It really is determined more often than not by circumstances. 

      July 4, 2016 11:17 AM MDT
    0

  • 258

    It has already been done with dogs and cats. The earliest I remember any mention of dog life expectancy, it was 10 years, and people used the simple multiple of 7 for dog to human years since humans lived 70 years. Now 13 or even 16 years is considered a reasonable life expectancy, especially for smaller breeds, and a similar life expectancy for cats if they stay out of outdoor accidents.

      July 4, 2016 11:44 AM MDT
    0

  • 373

    Let's hope so.

      July 4, 2016 5:01 PM MDT
    0

  • 22891

    try it and see what happens

      July 4, 2016 5:19 PM MDT
    0