What does Ivanka bring to a table where she was NOT invited. Who invited her? Is she an elected official that the Prime Minister needs to address?
This was Trump and the Prime Minister. Not Trump and his friends and family. It screams I DON'T KNOW PROTOCOL.
I think I will bring my daughter to my next place of business. I think she will enjoy herself. So what if it is inappropriate and she is not supposed to be there. She's my daughter.
Can you imagine working in a place that allows that? No simple company would allow it. So, why would Trumpeven think this is a good idea? Because he is an ignoramus. Trump does not get it. Japan is very concerned with respect. And if you are too damned ignorant to not realize this can piss people off and disrespect you for disrespecting the office of Prime Minister of Japan, then you are a MORON. He just announced that truth once more. Loud and clear.
I'm pretty sure Obama did not bring his kids to meet the Prime Minister of Japan when he met with him. I'm sure no one else did this and was welcomed back there.
Obviously the first lady was not invited either. But would you bring that to meet anyone? Even Trump is not that dumb.
She had no speech to copy and ape to the Prime Minister I guess.
Oh and in case you do not understand? The Prime Minister was there to discuss information with the President of the United States, not the Vice President and certainly not the FIRST DAUGHTER.
Perhaps you have the Usual Suspect habit of not actually reading the links you post?
Had you done so, there is one extremely relevant Twitter noted in the article...
"Ivanka Trump, responsible for running Trump businesses, sits in on meeting with a foreign power. Conflict of interest is an understatement."
There are several other Twitter posts which reiterate the same theme.
Now, if your counterargument is "everybody does it" (i.e. that the Rich and Powerful get away with s**t like this, analogs of which would land Ordinary Joes/Janes in jail), you have a point. OTOH, one of Trump's campaign themes was that he knew how "the game is played" and would, therefore, be the most qualified person to fix it. Instead (as I warned every Trump slurper who bought that argument), he knows how the game is played and, because he's a "winner," he's going to play it for all it's worth.
It is you who wasted your time reading the link .. If you had a clue to how I joke around with Sharon, you may have realized, it had nothing to do with you. In this case don't waste my time with your unsolicited analysis.
@Ranpolage -- You are correct. I did not know that you were kidding and, at the time I posted my reply, I had NOT seen your interaction with Sharonna. In my defense, I cite two things:
1) Humor does not always translate well on the Internet. Even when you THINK you're being over-the-top and obvious, it is not always so. In fact, I recently read an article about someone who has made a decent living creating fake "news" and posting it on Facebook.
2) Related to 1) above, in these strange times we live in, the difference between the genuine beliefs/attitudes of our political fringes and the hyperbole critics would use to lampoon those fringes is quite small. That makes it very hard to tell whether someone is trolling (Obama is a Nazi Kenyan Marxist Socialist Indonesian Terrorist Communist Muslim bent upon destroying America!) or is serious (Obama is a Nazi Kenyan Marxist Socialist Indonesian Terrorist Communist Muslim bent upon destroying America!)
Not knowing what was said before and during the meeting, I don't know if it was inappropiate. Ivanka's husband was also in the meeting. I would bet she was asked to stay for the meeting.
The post does not say anything about if they were invited or not. It just says the media was throwing a fit. Our press did not know. Until the Jap gov handed them the picture.
My grandmother is Okinawan. I simply abbreviated Jap for Japanese my Grandpa used abbreviate the same way. Saying Jap doesn't offend her but calling her Japanese does.....she is very specific, she is not Japanese she is Okinawan.
"Not knowing what was said before and during the meeting, I don't know if it was inappropiate."
Translation: Because Trump is a Good White Republican, I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt.
"Ivanka's husband was also in the meeting."
Translation: Because Trump is a Good White Republican, I'm going to cite an irrelevant fact which in no way mitigates the conflict of interest in having Invanka, who is in charge of Trump family businesses, in this meeting.
" I would bet she was asked to stay for the meeting."
Translation: Because Trump is a Good White Republican, I'm going to invent a theoretical justification for Ivanka Trump attending the meeting, even though I have NO KNOWLEDGE my hypothetical justification happened, nor will I acknowledge that hypothetical justification does NOT mitigate the inherent conflict of interest objection to Ivanka attending the meeting.
You are so right. Race is only one of the atrocities. Religion is the even better one. God is on the side of YOUR side. Right? Well, I am just your version of a Liberal, though I am probably more conservative than you are.
Here is an accurate definition of a Liberal according to your people. Those conservatives? Yep. These are arch conservatives telling it like it is in much the same manner as what comes out of your head.
As long as I am on God's side...He is on mine. Liberal Republican is actually how I described myself when I was in high school lol....I don't have any liberal left in me.
I will take your word for it that idiots were circulating racist pict about the Obama's. I can say in all honesty that NO sent or showed me that kind bs. That is not how I think and people who know me, know I am not interested in that junk.
Do you think I care what you think or want? The fact is people who are so obsessed with race... should probably look in the mirror when looking for the racist. The facts are it was not a formal meeting. We don't know exactly when the picture was taken or what they were discussing at the time the picture was taken. I