Me: None. I already use other more tailored groups for other questions that aren't fitting inside a more varied main board. Furthermore, those who wants to reply on political questions will be inside the debate room together with me, and likely notice my question as much as now, if not even more. Hmm.
For newcomers, here is a link for the group: Debate Room
I don't think it's right to censor and I think we're looking at this from the wrong direction. If the people on this thread each asked one question a day, we would not look like a political site. The other questions would overrun the feed. I don't know if you remember how Princess Liz/ Tanzanite and I used to play on AB, but we'd assign each other topics and the other party would have to go ask 10-20 questions about it. I remember one time she gave me frogs, and before I knew it, the entire site was asking about frogs that night because I kicked off a trend. She and I did that time and time again... almost on a nightly basis for about six months. It was a hoot. Some people griped about the volume, but most people seemed to enjoy the diversity in questions. While I don't like the concept of "manipulation," that exactly what she and I were doing to the feed there. The same thing could be happening here. All it takes is a couple of people to decide they don't like the tone of the questions and go with something else. Those political questions will fade into obscurity. You guys already have the power to change what's on the site without restricting anyone.
I'm going to think some more on this. I think there's a better way here. I may create a group for people who want to commit themselves to creating diversity in the feed... maybe an "I will ask 10 questions a day" or something. I could also drop a ticker or RSS feed on the home page with trending news as an inspirational thing to see if we can get more ideas hitting the board. IMO, that's the fix here. We need more diversity, not less political stuff.