Active Now

Reverend Muhammadovsky
Discussion » Statements » Rosie's Corner » It'd be far better for the country if the 3 branches of government were supportive of one another, not combative. Why aren't they?

It'd be far better for the country if the 3 branches of government were supportive of one another, not combative. Why aren't they?

Posted - July 1, 2017

Responses


  • 1233
    Why do you think the 3 branches were set up as separate entities in the first place? It's precisely because the founders thought conflict was desirable. It helps prevent one person ever consolidating total power. 

    Combat is what democracy is all about. The only type of government without combat is a complete dictatorship.

    The communists and the corporatists have to be suppressed. There is no working together with them. They're scum. Civilization is not built by accepting everyone. It is done by the suppression of those would destroy it. This post was edited by Zeitgeist at July 7, 2018 1:21 AM MDT
      July 1, 2017 7:37 AM MDT
    1

  • 22891
    i think they should be supportive too
      July 1, 2017 1:50 PM MDT
    0