Active Now

Spunky
Discussion » Questions » Religion and Spirituality » Jehovah's Witnesses: Do your culinary artists, at the Watchtower, approve or disapprove transgender rights?

Jehovah's Witnesses: Do your culinary artists, at the Watchtower, approve or disapprove transgender rights?

Posted - July 26, 2017

Responses


  • 3463
    You know what is funny antibiotic, is that most witnesses don't keep involving themselves in religious conversations with people who are not interested in learning and becoming a JW.
    They would make their point and then leave.
    Overloading the threads with information that has nothing to do with the subject and most people just scroll by, is not doing them any good that I can see.
    I guess this is easier then knocking on doors to count their time, but it's not very productive.
      August 4, 2017 9:45 AM MDT
    2

  • 7280
    Absolutely, Autumnleaves---As a believer in God and one who is sincere of heart, I am indeed provoked when I read the conclusions of the Jehovah's Witnesses that are based on their quasi-theology and minsunderstand and misinterpretation of what the bible says.


    Edited due to spell check not working---Anyone else have a similar problem lately? This post was edited by tom jackson at August 5, 2017 2:50 PM MDT
      August 4, 2017 12:54 PM MDT
    2

  • 1326
    So you say.
      August 5, 2017 10:00 AM MDT
    0

  • 492
    and he's right


      August 5, 2017 2:50 PM MDT
    0

  • 2657
    You might actually try reading the Bible before deciding who is misinterpreting what the Bible says. 
    I forget, what year was it that Catholics started being allowed to read the Bible? 
    Funny how in many threads you champion the Catholic understanding of the Bible and then when scriptures come in to play you say something like the Bible doesn't teach us everything in relation to God and Jesus or something like that.
    I would think that a sincere person would either believe and follow the Bible or else just admit that as a Catholic, they don't give a flip about what the Bible says. 

    https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02033b.htm
    CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: The Athanasian Creed
     

     

    At various points the author calls attention to the penalty incurred by those who refuse to accept any of the articles therein set down.

     

    The Father Incomprehensible, the Son Incomprehensible, and the Holy Ghost Incomprehensible

     

    So likewise the Father is Almighty, the Son Almighty, and the Holy Ghost Almighty. And yet they are not Three Almighties but One Almighty.

     

    So there is One Father, not Three Fathers; one Son, not Three Sons; One Holy Ghost, not Three Holy Ghosts. And in this Trinity none is afore or after Other, None is greater or less than Another, but the whole Three Persons are Co-eternal together, and Co-equal

     

    Who, then, is the author? The results of recent inquiry make it highly probable that the Creed first saw the light in the fourth century, during the life of the great Eastern patriarch, or shortly after his death

     

    The "damnatory", or "minatory clauses", are the pronouncements contained in the symbol, of the penalties which follow the rejection of what is there proposed for our belief. It opens with one of them: "Whosoever will be saved, before all things it is necessary that he hold the Catholic Faith". The same is expressed in the verses beginning: "Furthermore, it is necessary" etc., and "For the right Faith is" etc., and finally in the concluding verse: "This is the Catholic Faith, which except a man believe faithfully and firmly, he cannot be saved". Just as the Creed states in a very plain and precise way what the Catholic Faith is concerning the important doctrines of the Trinity and the Incarnation, so it asserts with equal plainness and precision what will happen to those who do not faithfully and steadfastly believe in these revealed truths..

    .From a dogmatic standpoint, the merely historical question of the authorship of the Creed, or of the time it made its appearance, is of secondary consideration.  The fact alone that it is approved by the Church as expressing its mind on the fundamental truths with which it deals, is all we need to know.

      August 8, 2017 6:39 AM MDT
    0

  • 46117
    Did you wake up and decide to start hating something for no reason?
      August 2, 2017 7:56 PM MDT
    3

  • 7280
    Probably not---it's just that when there is too much bullsh*t in the air, our need to breate comfortably forces us to either shovel the sh*t out and bring on the disinfectant--- or at least try to seal off the source and/or drive the bull away.
      August 4, 2017 1:03 PM MDT
    1

  • 2657
    So you see a question that is an unwarranted jab at JW's and feel the need to chime in with nothing to offer?
      August 5, 2017 12:46 PM MDT
    1