Discussion»Statements»Rosie's Corner» Defenders/supporters/admirers who deny/attack/insult on behalf of a perp are really co-conspirators and perps too aren't they? Guilty too?
Far....it was last year. Okay how about Deddie W Shultz and her IT workers who are umder investigation for selling gov information to foriegn enemies? That is now...current enough?
WOW. That is a stretch. I mean who is she? What far reach did she have and what did she sell?
Under investigation? What does that mean? Hillary was "under investigation too" for no reason. It cost her the election when there was no reason to even investigate.
Now Trump? There are so many valid investigations, who knows where to start?
This is all you got?
I'd rather look into Jeff Sessions talking to the Russians.
Wasserman Schultz was elected chairperson of the Democratic National Committee in May 2011, replacing Virginia Senator Tim Kaine.[2][3] On July 24, 2016, Wasserman Schultz announced her resignation from her position after Wikileaks released a collection of hacked emails indicating that Wasserman Schultz and other members of the DNC staff showed bias against the presidential campaign of Senator Bernie Sanders in favor of Hillary Clinton's campaign.[3] Her resignation was finalized on July 28 following the 2016 Democratic National Convention.[4] She was subsequently appointed honorary chair of the Clinton campaign's "50 state program".[73]
This post was edited by WM BARR . =ABSOLUTE TRASH at August 23, 2017 6:02 AM MDT
Who is DWS? She was the head.of the Democratic National Committee. Just the head of the party....other Dems fired the IT person when they were told about it. But she kept him on for monthes more. He stole hundreds of thousands of tax payer dollars.
You want to talk about Sessions and Russia? Why not about DWS' IT guy, the country he likely sold the information to.....RUSSIA. He could be the source for Wikileaks...(just speculation on my part)
This post was edited by my2cents at August 23, 2017 10:07 AM MDT
Your partisanship is showing m2c. Where in my question did I put anything remotely political? Nowhere. That's where. You carry that albatross with you everywhere don't you? It's getting heavier while you are getting older. At some point you are going to have to lay it down or it will take you down. Tsk tsk tsk m2c. There are other things in life besides politics. I'd check them out if I were thee. Life will be far more pleasant. I guarantee! :) Thank you for your reply.
Just about question is political.....and I know what the media is saying right now. They are claiming if you defend or vote R then you are a racist. And I know how the questions come in, I can watch Morning Joe and know that will be a question on AM soon.
This post was edited by my2cents at August 23, 2017 9:37 AM MDT
It is interesting to me that the plaintiff and the defendant frequently think the same evidence to be probative for their particular conclusions. Wouldn't life be boring otherwise? Viva la difference!!!
Rosie, if a question is not political, then maybe putting it somewhere besides the 'politics' category would be helpful. Also, you are the last person who should be telling someone there are other things besides politics.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAA! Everything you post is about politics. When you post questions like this, if the person who answers says something ab out politics, you jump all over them, if they don;t mention anything about politics, you jump all over them. Your questions are nothing more than great big bear traps ready to spring close on whoever is foolish enough to answer you...except for maybe two or three people. This got old a LOOOOONG time ago.
If that were true, I'd want you in prison or hanging from a rope.
That is the kind of talk that leads to bloody civil wars. You can't really know if the motives of others are sincere and well intentioned. If you don't give people the benefit of the doubt, you can't expect to receive it.
This post was edited by Zeitgeist at August 23, 2017 11:11 AM MDT
The phrase "reasonable to infer" immediately comes to mind. You use the specific word "perp"---which an internet slang dictionary defines as: perpetrator" (i.e. person who committed a crime.) Police slang.
They may not be criminally liable, but if certain such people lived in my neighborhood, I would tend give some focused attention to them to see to what extent their words might lead to certain actions on their part.
And you are all of those, and do a great job. But.... then there is that glitch....
my2cents 