Active Now

Element 99
Discussion » Questions » Education » When a man puts a woman in a XXX film it is exploitation but when the woman sleeps with the man for the lead role

When a man puts a woman in a XXX film it is exploitation but when the woman sleeps with the man for the lead role

what then we call it? Please educate.

Posted - October 15, 2017

Responses


  • 6124
    Making a living.
      October 15, 2017 6:42 PM MDT
    2

  • 5614
    Mayhap ;)
    perhaps selling out? This post was edited by O-uknow at October 15, 2017 8:30 PM MDT
      October 15, 2017 6:46 PM MDT
    1

  • 14795
    It's not the sleeping with him that's matters so much I think.....it's the staying awake bit that matters the most and secures the role.....:( This post was edited by Nice Jugs at October 15, 2017 8:25 PM MDT
      October 15, 2017 6:51 PM MDT
    2

  • 6124
    I think it's pretending she really likes it that secures the role. lol. 
      October 15, 2017 7:14 PM MDT
    1

  • 14795
    I would think it might help a bit......but I think it more the power thing  that he really gets off on.....kind of self satisfaction that he can get away with doing it and being able to brag about who he's had and what he did...:(
      October 15, 2017 8:30 PM MDT
    1

  • 2960
    I thought Vin Diesel was the lead in those movies.
      October 15, 2017 7:16 PM MDT
    2

  • 2327
    But what if a woman puts a woman in an XXX film? How is that any different? Lots of ex porn actresses are now at the production level. 
      October 15, 2017 7:24 PM MDT
    1

  • "When a man puts a woman in an XXX film, it's exploitation."

    If XXX means hard core sexually explicit pornography, and if exploitation means treating someone unfairly in order to benefit from their work, then it's the exact circumstances of the filming that makes the difference. Is the woman legally an adult? Is she free of all drugs? Has she been captured, threatened or harmed? Has she been offered a written contract with fair working conditions? Have the conditions been met?

    In the more general sense, feminists do not agree with the making of pornographic films because they can encourage immature, inexperienced and ignorant men to see a woman as a potential object of sexual gratification (rather than as a full human being with needs, wishes and preferences which are usually not the same as his.) It can put ideas in some men's heads which many women may find extremely unwelcome.

    If an actress cannot get an acting role unless she copulates with the director, then she can't be the best talent and she'd be far better off in another job. 

    If the director and the film-script hasn't attracted  the best actress for the film, then he's not making the best film and he's jeopardising the investor's money.
    If the director can't get sex unless he offers an acting role, he'd do better work as a film maker if he compartmentalised his needs. He can always go to a whorehouse for sex.

    If we're talking about Weinstein, his entire personality and behaviour is repugnant. 

    But if two consenting adults feel attracted to each other, and there are no other negative factors, then there's no reason why they shouldn't enjoy one another. This post was edited by Benedict Arnold at October 16, 2017 4:25 AM MDT
      October 15, 2017 10:10 PM MDT
    1

  • She works hard for her money.  SO HARD FOR IT HONEY.
      October 15, 2017 10:32 PM MDT
    1

  • 1326
    This is a world filled with double standards of many kinds. This post was edited by Autumnleaves at March 2, 2018 11:44 PM MST
      March 2, 2018 10:02 PM MST
    0

  • 46117
    When a man puts a woman in a xxx film, that is sex slavery.  Unless she is putting herself in that film, he is committing a crime.

    If she sleeps with the head of a film company, the only crime she is committing is against herself.
      March 2, 2018 10:06 PM MST
    0