In the nineteenth century, Pope Pius IX was the first pope to officially declare animals soulless and thus unable to enter heaven. In the decades since Pius’ proclamation, popes have continued to waffle over the issue of animals.
Pope John Paul II went the opposite direction. In 1990 he is reported to have said animals must have souls, as they were “created by God’s breath.” But almost 20 years later Pope Benedict XVI said God only gives access to heaven to humans.
Benedict’s words can be hard for pet lovers to reconcile. Many of us can say we have been comforted by our pets during unimaginably hard times. Somehow, they always seem to know when something is wrong and do everything in their power to help the situation without the use of words.
However, Pope Francis’ statement in Laudato Si’ helps to finally lay the age-old question to rest. By immortalizing his words in writing, the pope leaves no room for misunderstanding or hearsay: dogs and our other animal companions will join us in the Kingdom of Heaven.
This is a hugely important step for Fido and for those who love him. Thanks for Pope Francis and his love for animals (which is reflected in the name he chose to bear as pope) I can finally confidently say, with a comforted smile one my face, “all dogs go to heaven.”
My Catholic faith is well informed by logic and reason and by continually remaining open to what God allows me to understand based on that personal relationship I have with Him thanks to the Resurrection. (Oh Happy Fault of original sin)
Truth exists and is the proper object of study. As I came to understand more and more of the truth that involves God specifically (the obvious truths talked about in the bible and the logical conclusions that follow from those those truths) along with the understandings that come from seeking the relationship with God as Jesus instructed us to do, I came to both think and believe (the gift of faith is from God, of course) what I do.
I am a Catholic by "cradle" and by choice----unshakably so since I tried my best to disprove much of Catholic doctrine to myself in my late 20's and early 30's since that doctrine was, to say the least, flying directly and intensely into my face of my preferred lifestyle during those years---and I came grudgingly to the realization and conviction that Catholicism was indeed the rock upon which Christ built His Church and to which he sent the Holy Spirit to watch over it.
Doctrine---a belief or set of beliefs held and taught by a church, political party, or other group. It turned out that Catholic doctrine and my understanding of reality turned out with pretty much the same. So in my case, my personal "doctrine"---formulated by study, philosophy and theology---turned out to be very similar to what the Catholic Church had come to understand.
So all of that just proved the following maxim: The human intellect cannot be put in possession of its object by some exterior agent that takes it there. There is for us no knowledge except our own knowledge, no truth except self-acquired truth.
We have a cognitive sense and free will. Other animals have an estimative sense and instincts. All other creation also has a connection to God. The bible only gives instructions for mankind for entering into everlasting life. For men it is optional and he needs instructions; for the rest of creation---well, apparently we don't need to know the details of how that works.
Glad you were dealing with a "nice Catholic gentleman"---we are not always nice, which I think comes from being human.
As to what we are going to do in heaven, God said we should avoid speculation---but I do think that we are going to grow in knowledge and truth and the capacity to love.
And in addition, I think personally that I am also going to be petting one cat and playing with a number of dogs.
What I have hoped for since I first came across you is some hint that being a JW rather than a Catholic is more rewarding for you than being a Catholic is for me.
I have yet to see that.
God is willing to sit next to you (figuratively at least) and you could be talking to Him about what you should be doing in this life.
Instead, you prefer to try to understand what He said 2000 or so years ago, rather than what it should mean to you now after the men He also inspired to interpret what it meant for the succeeding generations of men did their job.
I guess I'll leave you in the care of the "Hound of Heaven."
Edit:
Your comment that my faith journey is no more than an "appeal to ego" is a telling comment on your part. Not only is it judgmental---which you know the bible warns about---it an example of incredible arrogance.
And no one on here would think that as an example of arrogance based on excellence.
Apparently, you have no knowledge of a god beyond his being the primary subject of a book called the bible.
You talk about him rather than to him---pitiful..