Discussion » Statements » Rosie's Corner » I FINALLY saw the Al Gore movie "An Inconvenient Truth". Have you? What didja think of it and why?

I FINALLY saw the Al Gore movie "An Inconvenient Truth". Have you? What didja think of it and why?

Posted - February 9, 2018

Responses


  • 1233
    Yes. Al Gore is human garbage.

    The movie should be renamed "Very convenient bullsh*t pretext for global government and austerity".
      February 9, 2018 11:35 AM MST
    2

  • 3375
    I thought it was very well done.  I'm baffled on why anyone would put him in such a hateful light for his opinion on what is happening to the environment.  He is backed by solid science.
      February 9, 2018 11:39 AM MST
    3

  • 1233
    It's not his genuine opinion. He's lying to push political objectives. If he were just an ordinary guy, maybe he could be forgiven for being innocently duped. I don't believe that someone in his position, who has profiteered massively by selling carbon indulgences, is sincere. He's a lying ****.

    It's not backed by solid science. The scientists involved are part of the climatology industry and have a vested interest in pushing it. To deny man made global warming would be literally calling for the end of their funding. It's their meal ticket.

    A silent majority of the scientists don't agree but most are too afraid to speak out because they know the establishment would destroy their careers.

    Man made climate change is a pretext to subordinate the nations of the world under a global authority that has centralised control of the means of production. It's pure Marxism and it must be destroyed. This post was edited by Zeitgeist at February 9, 2018 5:27 PM MST
      February 9, 2018 1:14 PM MST
    2

  • 3375
    Let's agree to disagree.  Thanks.
      February 10, 2018 12:17 PM MST
    1

  • 113301
    :):):) Very measured and intelligent reply my friend! Kudos! :) ((hugs))
      February 11, 2018 5:14 AM MST
    0

  • 113301
    Solid Science is anathema to climate change deniers PeaPod.  They cahn't stend it so they vilify it and anyone promulgating it. Thank you for your reply and Happy Sunday! :)
      February 11, 2018 5:13 AM MST
    1

  • 3375
    I never understood how this got to be a political issue considering this IS affecting us all, like it or not.  I trust science more than a political platform.  What do scientist gain by sharing this info with us?  And why does it make a politician wrong to agree with it?  Is it because some in politics worry we may have to do more to regulate big corporations that are polluting the environment?  Makes me wonder.
      February 11, 2018 11:41 AM MST
    1

  • 113301
    As far as I can "guess" it's all because of cleaning air costs more money than polluting it. Keep poison out of ground water costs more more than diverting to elsewhere. Polluting the oceans is much cheaper than finding other trash cans to store toxic  waste. It's all about the money honey. Regulations cuase people to spend money they other can keep and spend on biggers houses and vacations and yachts and diamonds. If it cost more money to pollute than to clean we'd have clean in a heartbeat. I'm gonna ask. Thank you for your reply PeaPod.
      February 14, 2018 6:52 AM MST
    1