Weaponizing teachers. In a surprise attack the shooter takes out the teacher first. So what was gained? Teacher dies first. Then what?

A school has more than one teacher, does it not? Ideally another teacher shows up and shoots the perpetrator in the face. If the shooter kills everyone, then the shooter kills everyone. Sometimes the worst happens. What are you saying? Our defence might fail so there is no point in having one?

One thing is certain, everyone who is unarmed when the event beings hopes and prays that SOMEONE ARMED will show up to defend them quickly. The quicker that happens, the quicker the situation is contained and the less people die.

The right don't care who that someone is. We welcome the idea that anyone would have the courage to risk their life to defend others, instead of just running away to save themselves.

The left have always wanted the state to have a monopoly of power and everyone to be dependent on it. It hates the idea of people being strong. It feels threatened by the strength of individuals. The left know they're weak and cowardly. Seeing someone be strong makes them feel pathetic. This post was edited by Zeitgeist at February 24, 2018 12:46 AM MST