I've read some articles by economist widely acclaimed to be at the top of their field in the world. They believe, based on research including government, reserve bank, commercial banking and business audit figures, that America has the highest net debt in the world and is at serious risk of default. According to them, the interest on the interest on the interest cannot be paid because there is insufficient real capital or income - the system currently works entirely on trust. Another event such as the Lehman Bros collapse or a mass default on sub-prime loans (many exist in leveraging on the stock market) could cause a GFC far worse than the last, and far worse than the great Depression. They estimate that recovery would not be possible. I will try to find those articles and track back to the writers and their sources for you.

I accept that all governments lie about their current accounts and expenditures, and the accounts of the outgoing administrations, but I don't believe those distortions significantly change the grounds for my reasoning.

It was not you Ms S

It's ok.

I understand. Nothing wrong with trying. You did good.

From which orifice did you pull this "majority of scholars" claim?

Dressing up your HRC-bashing with sexism does you no credit.

So if I were to say that men are better suited for certain occupations such as Navy Seals, culinary arts, firemen, boxing, fighter pilots, etc etc, that would be sexist or someone who knows the real world. Please!!!!!!!!

LOL!!! 

That's the tripe that a Neo-Nazi, White Nationalist was pedaling.  

Now the true colours of the Trump supporters are starting to come to light. 

I didn't know Margaret Thatcher was ever the President of the United States. Lol:)

Dude, ask me what women are better suited for and I'll give you a list, please don't show your ignorance by suggesting that neo Nazism has anything to do with this. Do actual research on the reality.

OS Like

1. First you have to know women are not emotionally disturbed, just because they are women.
2. Everyone has emotions.
3. Hillary is as qualified as Bill Clinton or Barack Obama to be President of the US.
4. Margaret Thatcher was a conservative Republican. That may have been her problem with the way she ran the country.
5. Hillary is no criminal. She has never been indicted for any crime. If you want to see if Ronald Reagan, George W. Bush, George H.W. Bush, Richard Nixon, and other Presidents who have committed war crimes, I could give you a list of them. They would be qualified for those, although they never have been indicted.

How's 999,000, here's a couple pictures you can frame.

 

@BSD -- First of all, you are not required to like HRC. You can dislike her for any number of reasons or no reason at all.

That being said, you have made a number of howling logical mistakes in defense of sexism.

1)  Mistaking averages and extremes for individuals -- Yes, it's true that the VERY BEST fighter pilots in the world, the VERY BEST boxers in the world, and so forth are better than any woman alive at those skills. But if you or I went up against one of the many well-trained female fighter pilots in the world, or got in the ring against Rhonda Rousey, we would quickly have our rear ends handed to us.

Similarly, if you took 100 men at random and 100 women at random, on average the men would be better boxers than the women. But if one of those 100 wowen was Rhonda Rousey, chances are she'd hand the other 199 people their collective rear ends.

Where HRC lies on the bell curve of US presidential candiates, we do not know.

2) Multiple failures around the concept of "emotional stability"  -- You do not define what it is, how you measure it, where HRC lies on any measure of it, nor do you establish what measure of "emotional stability" (assuming you could define it) is either necessary or desirable in a President (keep in mind Presidents such as Andrew Jackson, Dwight Eisenhower, and Bill Clinton were all known for their volatile tempers).

Throw in the fact you failed to back up your claim about "the majority of scholars" and, yeah, pretty much your claim is HRC-bashing with a generous dollop of anti-women bigotry.

You have les sense than TRUMP. I think the surfboard hit you on the head one time too many.  Lie much?

Maybe you are mentally unstable.   They say when you point a finger, three are pointing back at you.  Get therapy and stop talking about subjects you know zero about. 

Is Donald Trump mentally unstable?

That's better, but the majority of scholars still didn't say that. Next time, open with that. You've already given away the game.

I don't have pictures of Hilary Clinton, and I have no use for yours. The fact that you have them to give is quite telling. I'm sure they come in handy on those lonely nights.

So, quit stalling and frame them your d*** self.

Neo Nazism and White Nationalism go hand-in-hand. 

I've done my research and one thing I've learned is that there is a thin veil draped over one in attempt to differentiate it over the other.

I suggest that when you make a statement or ask a question and invite feedback, you behave a little more civil to those that respond.

Fact's are facts...White Nationalists, Racist, Ne-Nazi's are all excited bout the prospect of a trump presidency and they will do anything and say anything to ensure that happens. That includes bring up a mysoginistic, false belief that men are superior to women.  

White Nationalists Love Trump’s Convention: “GOP Is Becoming The De Facto White Party”

http://mediamatters.org/research/2016/07/20/white-nationalists-love...

There are plenty of great female politicians who would be excellent candidates.  Instead we are running this hillary thing so we lose if we win.

HRC doesn't even count as female as far as I'm concerned. She is a psychopath and all normal female psychology doesn't apply.

Women generally lack perspective. They have a tendency to get things completely out of all proportion, focusing on issues of minimal importance while ignoring the elephant in the room. They are overly concerned with feelings.

Women have evolved to care for children. This has led to a nurturing psychology that is designed to prioritise the short term immediate needs of a child. This is the absolute opposite of the long term strategic thinking a country needs. Women's morality tends to be more compassion based, instead of justice based. This has caused them to support excessive welfare programs at the expense of individual rights and long term fiscal sustainability.

We let the genie out of the bottle when we gave women the vote, and it's irreversible now. Leaders, male or female, will pander to the women's vote, so emotional politics is here to stay.

May I ask what your profile ID means? 

It's a reference to the Austrian School Of Economics.

No.  She shouldn't  be President, IMO.

He didn't say men are superior to women. He said men are generally better leaders.

It takes all sorts to make a world. Men and women are different and bring different things to the table. If you see leaders as being superior to the people who follow them, that's your issue.

 

OK... I was wondering if was referring to Hitler's home country.

The  thinking reflected in your statement is psuedo-science and was very much the same that was in place back in earlier days.  I would love to hear your opinion of domestic abuse  (or as it was called back in the day, Discipline).

I may be wrong, but your comment could have very well been written by a male in one of the muslim societies such as Saudi Arabia where women are rquired to wear a Burkah and be subserviant to men.