So is the crook rant-tweeting yet about his predicment? Or is he quiet as a mousy louse in a house hiding out?.

No campaign funds were used. 

Then how does he explain his payment of $130,000 to Stormy Daniels?  This story has taken more turns than a mountain road.

Cohan says he paid it through a line of credit on his home. Then Trump reinbursed him with Trumps money from his business....no campaign finds involved. 

I will ask you again:  Why would Trump reimburse Cohen $130,000.00 from his own funds?

Why? It was hush money. Not campaign funds. 
Campaign expenses are expenses that "benefit the candidate for the specific purpose of an election"....it also states that to be a campaign expense vs. a personal expense it must be an expense that "the candidate would not require if not running for office". Otherwise, things such as haircuts, massages, new clothes, paying employees a bonus, settling a courtcase before an election so it goes away, etc would be considered campaign expenses. They are not they are personal expenses.

Do you believe these are the only women Trump has paid hush money? Do you believe he would have refused to pay these women if not for the election? If the answers to these two questions are No, the payments are not considered campaign expenses and Cohan's payment to them is not an illegal donation. The hush money is a personal expense that was paid with personal money. Nothing illegal....it is sleazy but not illegal and not an impeachable action. 

In the first place, we have not seen any proof so far that Trump paid this from his personal funds.  Just because he said it, doesn't make it true.  In fact, if he said it, it probably isn't true.  Second, Cohen is on tape discussing setting up a corporation through which the money was deposited in order to pay these women.  Third, you can't make a personal campaign contribution of $130,000 - what part of that don't you understand?

No one claims it was campaign money....not Trump, not Cohen, not Mueller. So i think they established it was not donated campaign funds. 
They are trying to claim since Cohen made the payment himself...it is a campaign donation. 
As I already explained, it is a PERSONAL expense and therefore NOT subject to any limitations. It would have been paid regardless that makes it a personal expense and not allowed as a campaign expense. Not hard to understand at all. 

No he said LYING in order to do the flipping should be illegal. 

Well, now that Mr. Pecker of the National Enquirer has obtained immunity, he will divulge the documents, tapes and other proof he has in his possession, so we'll see if Cohen lied.

So now The Enquirer is the real news?

Lol ;)

No, the Enquirer is not the real news.  The tapes and documents that the owner of the Enquirer has in his possession is the real news.  Please, don't play dense.

The tapes of info about stories for the Enquirer. Just because someone tells a tabloid a story does not make it true. You should not play dense either. 

You don't even know what's in the documents the enquirer has.  If there are tapes, I would think they could possibly corroborate what is being brought out.  It's easy enough to prove who's voice is on those tapes.  

Whatever it is....we know from what has leaked it is not about Russian collusion. It is about Trump having an affair. Why should I care? The country has knew for decades that Trump is a adulterer....the hush money was not campaign funds (Mueller does not even claim that) Again hush money not illegal. They couldn't even get a conviction on John Edwards whi for supporting his mistress with campaign funds. 

We don't know what other tapes Cohen has which may very well implicate Trump in some illegal activity on Trump's part, so I'm going to withhold judgment until the facts are out.  

When someone is given immunity, there really isn't much reason to lie.  Couple that with the corroboration from other "flippers," and there's reason to believe that Cohen is telling the truth.

Cohan said nothing that is illegal. For Trump. 
Cohan said it was hush money, paid by him and reimbursed by Trump. Even if you twist it to say Cohen over donated to campaign.....Trump gave the money back to Cohen. 
Trump would be allowed to contribute any dollar amount of his money he wants on the campaign. 
But it is a personal expense....so all that is void.

Cohen committed illegal acts, presumably at the behest of Trump which would make Trump a co-conspirator.

What did he do that was illegal in regards to Trump? 

Hush money....not illegal. Trump giving money to his own campaign not illegal. 
The rest of the thing Cohen plead guilty to have nothing to do with Trump but rather Cohen's businesses.

I see, so you've seen the information that Mueller has.  Interesting.

I have seen what Cohen plead guilty to and said Trump instructed him to do. And it is not illegal.Cohen plead to it to get a lesser sentence for his business crimes. 

Cohen is not the beginning and the end of Mueller's investigation.  What don't you understand about that?  It may not be his testimony that brings action against Trump, but someone else's.

You are who brought Cohen and what he plead to in court...not me. I understand things just fine. I don't talk down to you I would appreciate the same respect.

You keep repeating the same thing over and over and yet aren't even willing to agree with me that no judgment should be made until all the facts are in.  I've made that observation more than once, yet you keep going back to what Cohen had plead to, so it leads me to believe that you don't understand the point I'm making.  We ALL KNOW what Cohen plead to.  If that was the end of the information he could provide, Mueller wouldn't be interested in talking to him.  A reasonable person would conclude that he has more to tell and that more to tell might involve Trump.