Like red for the good people, blue for the bad people, and other colors for other divisions. Isn't that strange?
Who color-codes them?
Nothing.
Tattoos, brands and/or biometric implants are far more efficient. Paint rubs off. :-)
Aww, come on! That's not sporting. Give her some kibble whydon'tcha? :-)
Israel gets to do whatever they want. That's the rule.
Rewarded? Like children. Ridiculous.
I know right?
Why don't learn their place already. They should let israel do as they please, maintain an illegal occupation section off the land. And be happy about it. Who cares about 1967.
I should be happy too,lest I want to be call anti Semite.
Perfect response to a baiting question.
THE REALITY
And also this reality
Really is it Palestinians attacking Israel?
And if you have any sense then think again!
And are you fooling others or fooling your own self?
Hello M:
The Israeli's learned well from their previous oppressors..
excon
Well said.
Then you're in big trouble.
I wanna be a blue guy!!!!
For starts, there is no such country as Palestine. There never was. When the current state of Israel was last Muslim-ruled by the Ottoman Turks, it was split among 3 provinces - Mutasarrifate, Beiruit, and Syria. Neither then nor now was there a distinct "Palestinian" nation or identity. Palestine was the name given to a British Mandate, or territory, gained from the Ottoman Empire after World War 1. It was never self-governing. Without a real "Palestine" it would be hard to conjure-up such a thing as "Palestinians".
No individual "Palestinians" will be color coded. According to famed anti-Israel anti-Semite writer Jonathan Cook, what Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman proposes to do is several things, including new efforts to maintain dialog directly with Arabic-speaking peoples - bypassing their corrupt Hamas leadership - and color-coding the map parcels of various Arab-held districts with better official treatment for those that do not launch missiles or suicide-bomb ice cream parlors full of children.
If you were to do a search on the subject of your question, every link goes back to the same article by Jonathan Cook. Given his track record, it is hard to tell how much of it may vaguely resemble fact and how much is editorial opinion.
Did I say "search"? Once again, I help.