Discussion » Questions » Games » MONOPOLY: THE SOCIALIST EDITION? They do not even GET socialism right.

MONOPOLY: THE SOCIALIST EDITION? They do not even GET socialism right.

Yes, there's a socialism-themed Monopoly game. It packs a message tailored for capitalists

Harmeet Kaur

By Harmeet Kaur, CNN

 

Updated 3:05 PM ET, Fri August 23, 2019

 
Monopoly Socialism, manufactured by the toy company Hasbro, is a parody of the classic board game.
 
Monopoly Socialism, manufactured by the toy company Hasbro, is a parody of the classic board game.

(CNN)Winning is for capitalists. At least that's the message behind a parody of Monopoly that surfaced this week after a Twitter thread on the game spread widely.

In Monopoly Socialism, an official version of the game manufactured by the toy company Hasbro, players move around the board contributing to community projects "unless they can steal projects to get ahead," according to the product's description.
When players pass go, they get a $50 "living wage" as opposed to the usual $200, and the tokens are all dated artifacts like a typewriter, a phonograph, a pocket watch, an old-fashioned telephone and an old-style TV set.
"Get ready for laughs as the twists and turns of life put a damper on working toward a shared, utopian society," the description for Monopoly Socialism reads. "Cooperation isn't always what it's cracked up to be."
 
 
But depending on where you are on the political spectrum, the tone of the game is either condescending or tongue-in-cheek. It sparked debate this week when a Twitter thread highlighting the version went viral.
The game pokes fun at the idea of working together, presenting it as ultimately incompatible with the selfish motivations of some players. Players are offered a series of choices that seem to highlight the potential for others to defect from "socialism." They can either contribute to the community fund, or choose to deplete it. They can consider the best interest of the group, or do what is in their individual interest.
"Working together might seem ideal, but Chance Cards can abruptly shake things up with things such as lousy neighbors, vegan meatloaf and bad plumbing," the description states.
It's unclear how vegan meatloaf is a disruption to the social order, but it's one of many references to veganism and health food in the game that seem to echo how the internet often loves to make fun of and/or hate on those things.
"Everyone loves the tofu-chip cookies you made in honor of Karl Marx's birthday," reads one of the cards. Another card mentions the "homemade granola you brought for lunch."

A historian says the game gets socialism wrong

"It goes without saying that this game is entirely uninterested in trying to understand what socialism actually is and how it might function," Nick Kapur, an assistant professor of history at Rutgers University, wrote in the viral Twitter thread.
 

Posted - August 26, 2019

Responses


  • 4625
    I'd say the game is not designed in ignorance but as a deliberate attempt to teach a false idea of what socialism is.

    Unfortunately, as far as I know, there has never been a living model of socialism working as its original theorists envisaged.
    I don't think this means that socialism is inherently flawed.
    Rather, it bears out the reality that all human systems will always be flawed - because they can only ever be the sum of our individual fallibilities.

    That said, I believe the socialist democracies of this world provide the best standards of living for the majority of their citizens - Denmark and the Scandinavian countries, Portugal and New Zealand.
      August 26, 2019 12:27 PM MDT
    2

  • 46117
    This could have been a great introductory training tool on some level.  Like in high-school or freshman college.  It might catch on.  But, instead they have a no-mind joke board for no-minds.  Thanks, book.  
      August 26, 2019 12:36 PM MDT
    0

  • 6023
    I don't know why they'd expect the socialism version to teach anything.
    The original version didn't really teach about monopolies.
      August 26, 2019 12:43 PM MDT
    3

  • 46117
    VERY GOOD POINT.   It showed how taking everything in the game is a Monopoly.  But that is not the definition of a true monopoly in reality.  

    Uh huh.  Maybe we could do better?  Than THIS at least.  This is about as opposite socialism as it gets, really.  Just stupid.  But it is the way a lot of people actually DO think about socialism.  


      August 26, 2019 12:48 PM MDT
    0

  • 6023
    Did you ever play a game where one player took everything?
    I don't recall ever playing where that happened.
    In fact, now that I think about it, I don't think we ever really finished a game.
    We would usually end when there were only 2 players left, because everybody else got tired of waiting and wanted to play something else ... and when they started, the last 2 wanted to play the new game also.  lol
      August 26, 2019 1:07 PM MDT
    1

  • 46117
    Yes.  Everything being all the other player's money.  But you are right.  It usually went on and on and we called it monotony.
      August 26, 2019 1:09 PM MDT
    0

  • 4625
    Yep.
    There was this girl, Suzie, the daughter of a real estate agent. 
    She always managed to establish a strong advantage very early in the game, and in the end she always got her monopoly, squeezed the rest of us out and won.
    Thirty years later, I had the chance to ask Katy if she knew the secret to Suzie's success.
    "Sure," she said, "she cheated. She started with wads of extra cash hidden under her corner of the board."
      August 26, 2019 1:15 PM MDT
    1

  • 46117
    WOW.  Was that Fred Trump's Grandmama, perhaps?  

    I know Monopoly was not invented then, but maybe it usurped it's former game board of TRUMOPOLY or NAZIOPOLY.  OR CONOPOLY.  OR ...

    so, they improved it, called it Democracy and TRUMP, like SUZIE cheated and took it all away anyway.  

    That's showbiz, folks!
      August 26, 2019 1:18 PM MDT
    0

  • 4625
    Yeah.
    I felt envious of Katy's sanguine understanding.
    She knew it even back when we were playing - and didn't mind.
    In her mind, since it was only a game, the value was just a shared experience of being together, an opportunity for laughter.
    But for me, not knowing the mystery of why I never seemed to be able to get an advantage - I began developing the self-belief that I was a natural-born loser.
    There is so much in this game that echoes real life.
    If I'd know the stakes were stacked back then, I would have refused to play.
      August 26, 2019 1:33 PM MDT
    0

  • The original game the mass produced  commercial version is based on was invented by a socialist ( Georgist to be exact) activist  to demonstrate the negative aspects of monopolistic capitalism and resource ownership. This post was edited by Benedict Arnold at August 26, 2019 5:07 PM MDT
      August 26, 2019 2:58 PM MDT
    1

  • 33036
    Yes. Elizabeth Magie in 1903 she called it The Landlord's Game.
    I would love to get an real original.
      August 26, 2019 5:07 PM MDT
    1

  • 33036
    It is a joke. It is meant to make fun of socialism. 

    I love all the versions of Monoply...real Monopoly but witb a theme. We have a bunch. Nintendo, Disney, Spongebob, Star Wars, Empire (not the show). But then we found MegaMonoply....this is the best game out there. More money, more properties, etc. It has more strategy to it. 
    We still love different tokens. So we order just token sets off ebay now.


    This post was edited by my2cents at August 26, 2019 4:54 PM MDT
      August 26, 2019 4:46 PM MDT
    1