Active Now

CosmicWunderkind
Danilo_G
Shuhak
Discussion » Statements » Rosie's Corner » Let us say there was nothing wrong with anything the impeached deadhead did or said. Anyone doing the same things would also be INNOCENT?
RosieG

Let us say there was nothing wrong with anything the impeached deadhead did or said. Anyone doing the same things would also be INNOCENT?

So if it were Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama who enlisted the exact same identical copycat help to win elections by begging hostile foreign gubment meddlings and getting dirt on the competition it would also be A okay all the way hey hey hey?

Swear on your children lives? Swear to GOD. Or is that just so much bullsh**?

Posted - December 22, 2019
Tags : None

Responses


  • 1152
    It's so much BS.

    We need only look at how then-Congressman Lindsey Graham approached the impeachment of Bill Clinton compared to his reaction to the impeachment of Donald Trump to see the defenders of Trump all revert ultimately to "Republicans...GOOD! Democrats...BAD!"

      December 22, 2019 8:15 AM MST
    1

  • 113301
    How do they not choke on their own duplicity SP? T'is a wonderment. Thank you for your reply and the video and Happy Sunday to thee! :)
      December 22, 2019 9:03 AM MST
    0

  • 34728
    Hillary did go to a foriegn nationalist to get information from a hostile foreign country to get dirt on her political opponent. 

    The Ukrainian courts ruled in Dec of 2018 that Ukr officals interfered in the 2016 US election. (Against Trump)


      December 22, 2019 8:23 AM MST
    0

  • 1152
    And then they didn't.

    https://www.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/court-cancels-earlier-ruling-that-ukrainian-officials-interfered-in-us-election.html?cn-reloaded=1


    That was almost too easy... This post was edited by SaltyPebble at December 22, 2019 9:04 AM MST
      December 22, 2019 8:45 AM MST
    1

  • 113301
    Easy does it every time! :):):)
      December 22, 2019 9:04 AM MST
    0

  • 34728
    Thank you, I was not aware of that. But the ruling was not overturned because of new facts or new information. But because of legal technicalities. The plantiff had no legal standing to file the case and a statue of limitations issue. 

    "He also said that Rozenblat had no right to file the lawsuit because his interests had not been affected and because, according to the Supreme Court, administrative courts cannot consider lawsuits against Verkhovna Rada lawmakers. Leshchenko added that the statute of limitations for the lawsuit had expired."

    (On a side note, if you but 2 spaces before and enter to a new line after, it will make your links live and clickable from the site when you post) 

      December 23, 2019 4:25 AM MST
    0