Discussion » Statements » Rosie's Corner » If Nancy NEVER SENDS ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT OVER TO moscow mitch son of an itch then the impeached deadhead will swing in the wind 24/7?
RosieG

If Nancy NEVER SENDS ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT OVER TO moscow mitch son of an itch then the impeached deadhead will swing in the wind 24/7?

Always impeached never vindicated. Swing dangling hangling to and fro wanting so much to get his case before the moscow mitch fake phony balony RIGGED Kangaroo Court. What's done is done. She is calling the bluff of the SOB's who have NO INTENTION of ever doing what is right and fair and just and legal. She knows it. She is in control in charge and will not be bullied by the likes of those Republican Senate EUNUCHS who are spineless toady sycophants now and forever. So far she has them by the you know whats. Never underestimate the POWER OF A WOMAN.

Posted - December 29, 2019
Tags : None

Responses


  • 46117
    We are watching him twist in the wind.  He is not happy and neither is his base.  They are threatening to use their guns.

    I wonder if the government will step in if Trump is ousted somehow.  Voted out or just run out of office.  That would start a WAR.

    We are on the precipice of a CIVIL WAR.  It is in the air and people on the RIGHT are cocked and ready.  They are violent.  They have the rage that we have but they have no filter.  They want blood. We do not want any.  

    We need the military to step in and wipe the murderers out.  DEAD.  That is the way to fight back. IF we don't have the government, we may as well get out of here, and move to Canada.  
      December 29, 2019 10:20 AM MST
    1

  • 113301
    I trust no one in the oinker administration including the military Sharon. The good guys are gone. What's left are more oinker adoring worshippers. Something good needs to happen. UNEXPECTED. Out of the blue. Fingers crossed. Thank you for your reply! :) This post was edited by RosieG at December 29, 2019 11:28 AM MST
      December 29, 2019 11:26 AM MST
    1

  • 34721
    If she never sends them, the Trump is not impeached.
      December 29, 2019 10:31 AM MST
    0

  • 46117
    I call it imeapchment lite.  
      December 29, 2019 11:27 AM MST
    1

  • 34721
    Lol. So does Trump. 
      December 29, 2019 12:57 PM MST
    0

  • 113301
    WRONG. THE HOUSE IMPEACHED HIM. The impeached deadhead will forever be ASTERISKED AS IMPEACHED. You know dam* well moscow mitch that son of an itch will vindicate him. HE ALREADY TOLD YOU SO. So the BS liars will give you what you want? A fake phony scam sham con "innocent". Good enough for you I trust but everyone knows it won't mean a friggin' thing. Thanks and well so long for now to thee m2c.. This post was edited by RosieG at December 29, 2019 11:30 AM MST
      December 29, 2019 11:29 AM MST
    0

  • 34721
    So you do not trust the Constitutional scholar Noah Feldman, who was one of Nadler's witnesses? 


    https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-12-19/trump-impeachment-delay-could-be-serious-problem-for-democrats

    According to Feldman it is not offical until it is sent to the Senate as impeachment is a process not a simple vote.
      December 29, 2019 12:06 PM MST
    0

  • 1152
    I'll trust Feldman's judgement that the articles have to be sent to the Senate if you'll trust Feldman's judgement (or that of numerous other Constitutional scholars) that Trump is actually guilty of the charges and should be removed.


    If you are not amenable to this bargain, then once again we have to assume you are picking Feldman's opinion because it agrees with what you wish to believe, not because he is an...ahem, unimpeachable authority on the matter. This post was edited by SaltyPebble at December 29, 2019 12:19 PM MST
      December 29, 2019 12:18 PM MST
    0

  • 34721
    You choose to trust him or do not. But do not pick and choose. 
      December 29, 2019 12:39 PM MST
    0

  • 1152
    Were you directing that statement at me, or were you looking in the mirror?

    You are perhaps familiar with the applicable Biblical quote from the Sermon on the Mount?


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_7:5

      December 29, 2019 12:43 PM MST
    0

  • 34721
    I am directing that at any who believe Feldman to be the Constitutional scholar in the relation to Trump impeachment. He is either an unbiased "constitutional scholar" or he is not. 
      December 29, 2019 12:46 PM MST
    0

  • 1152
    Exactly, do not pick and choose (your words)

    If you think Feldman is credible, than you should also give credence to his other statements about impeachment

    https://www.timesleader.com/opinion/op-ed/766447/noah-feldman-trump-impeachment-is-a-shot-in-the-arm-for-the-constitution

    If you don't think Feldman is credible, than you should perhaps trust another Constitutional scholar, for example Johnathan Turley, who disagreed with Feldman on which articles Congress should adopt but does assert now that Congress has voted, Trump is in fact impeached.

    https://jonathanturley.org/2019/12/20/trump-was-impeached-a-response-to-noah-feldman/


    Or you can come up with some other logical argument why Trump's impeachment isn't a "real" impeachment, instead of (inconsistently) Arguing From Authority. Given the vagueness of the Constitutional language involved, any argument you make will likely boil down to "Well, that's my opinion."

    Take your pick.

    Unless you think your admonition not to pick and choose does not apply to you personally? This post was edited by SaltyPebble at December 29, 2019 1:16 PM MST
      December 29, 2019 1:15 PM MST
    0

  • 34721
    I think he is a biased partisian who never should have been used as a witness. 

    Now I know he was quoted by Dems and the media as an unbiased Constitutional scholar. Those who think that of him...cannot pick and choose he is either an expert who we should all listen to or not. This post was edited by my2cents at December 29, 2019 1:35 PM MST
      December 29, 2019 1:34 PM MST
    0