Active Now

Danilo_G
Slartibartfast
Malizz
Discussion » Statements » Rosie's Corner » We are told he is 100% innocent. All his peeps say so. YET he REFUSED to allow testimony under oath to PROVE it! WHAT?
RosieG

We are told he is 100% innocent. All his peeps say so. YET he REFUSED to allow testimony under oath to PROVE it! WHAT?

How does that make any sense?

INSISTS he is completely innocent. Has dozens of peeps who insist he is completely innocent. When given the chance to let them prove his innocence in court under oath providing documents that would attest to that support he FORBIDS IT!

Something doesn't compute here. He and they are totally oblivious to it. We who observe are extremely sensitive to and aware of it. The difference between us and them is what exactly?

When you can PROVE something you do don't you? WHY DON"T HE? WHY DIDN'T HE? WHY WOULDN'T HE? WHY COULDN'T HE?

Could it be that he isn't innocent, has no proof, cannot trust his peeps to lie for him under oath? That would mean he is lying wouldn't it? Lying. Him? Lying? Oh dear. The sky is falling.

Posted - February 10, 2020
Tags : None

Responses


  • 46117
    I don't know where this info is coming from.  The whole SENATE said he was guilty but it don't matter.  They don't care.  So, neither does he.  
      February 10, 2020 12:16 PM MST
    0

  • 113301
    You ASSUME what others say matters. Your assumption is incorrect. All that matters is what don says. He says he is 100% innocent of any wrongdoing. That is the bottom lline for all time. What don sez goes. What don is the only truth. What don sez. Thank you for your reply Sharon.
      February 11, 2020 4:03 AM MST
    0