Discussion » Statements » Rosie's Corner » "Incitement to violent insurrection is NOT PROTECTED BY THE FIRST AMENDMENT". What idiot thinks it does?
RosieG

"Incitement to violent insurrection is NOT PROTECTED BY THE FIRST AMENDMENT". What idiot thinks it does?

Posted - February 11, 2021
Tags : None

Responses


  • 10637
    trump 
      February 11, 2021 3:25 PM MST
    1

  • 113301
    FOOTOO do as well as all his brainless ilk. Weird. Thank you for your reply Shuhak and Happy Friday to thee and thine! :)
      February 12, 2021 1:48 AM MST
    1

  • 1953
    Donald douchebag Trump
      February 11, 2021 3:59 PM MST
    1

  • 113301
    Yer! And all his adoring worshippers, toady sycophants and winya** scairdy cat terrified GOP Pols. Go figger! Thank you for your reply Echooos and Happy Friday to thee and thine! :)
      February 12, 2021 1:47 AM MST
    0

  • 1953
    Good morning Rosie , happy Friday to you too. :)
      February 12, 2021 3:47 AM MST
    1

  • 113301
    Merci Beaucoup m'dear! All good so far on your end? :)
      February 12, 2021 4:27 AM MST
    0

  • 34266
    Of course it doesn't But that is not what happened. 

    The procecutors proved it was preplanned....so how was it the speech? 
    The also proved that the attack began before President Trump had even begun speaking. 

    So was it the speech? Cannot be House proved that already. 
      February 11, 2021 5:35 PM MST
    1

  • 16772
    Worse, it's a clear violation of the oath of office. That's treason, a CAPITAL crime. Forget impeachment, stand him in front of a firing squad.
      February 12, 2021 1:54 AM MST
    1

  • 1953
    Best answer!!!!!
      February 12, 2021 3:48 AM MST
    0

  • 34266
    Again...it did not happen. 

    Left trying to have it both ways.  It was the speech....but it was preplanned.  If it was preplanned (and it was) it could not be the speech. 
      February 12, 2021 6:28 AM MST
    1

  • 16772
    Preplanned and paid for by His Royal Orangeness's OWN CAMPAIGN TEAM. From the War Chest he built by gulling his besotted worshippers.
      February 12, 2021 3:56 PM MST
    0

  • 34266
    If preplanned then the speech did not/could not have incited the riot. 


      February 13, 2021 8:14 AM MST
    0

  • 16772
    He BOUGHT the riot.
      February 14, 2021 3:46 AM MST
    0

  • 34266
    No. The riot did not serve Trump. The purpose of the riot was to stop the objections.  Which it did. 

    Do you know Cap Police Chief wanted National Guard help...it was denied 6 times.  Trump wanted the National Guard as well. He wanted to call them in Jan 4 or 5. Those in charge of the police and National Guard requests...said no. They did not like the optics.  Now who has that control? House and Senate Sergeant of Arms when answer to Pelosi and McConnell (now Schumer of course) with influence from the Mayor (Mayor is over Cap police) 
    This is why the Dems back pedalled on the witnesses.  Trump lawyers were going to call Pelosi, the House Sergeant of Arms and the Mayor.   

    Storming the Capitol did not benefit Trump.  
      February 14, 2021 4:09 AM MST
    0