Discussion»Questions»Television and Movies» Isn't it ironic that the best holiday of the year (Halloween) is the namesake of the crappiest horror movie franchise as well?
Yes. However, you have it backward in your original post; that's all I'm saying. The day called Halloween is not the namesake of the movie; the movie is the namesake of the day called Halloween.
name•sake (nāmˈsākˌ)
n. One that is named after another
This post was edited by Thriftymaid at October 30, 2016 12:18 PM MDT
I hate using wikipedia to make a point but oh well
"In general, the second recipient of a name, named for the first, is said to be the namesake of the first. The attribution can, however, go in the opposite direction, with namesake referring to the original holder of the name (the eponym).[3]"
Crappy is not the word for it, or any of those "horror" films; i.e., boring, 2 hours of mind-numbing nonsense passing as entertainment. I think people go to the show and watch them to make out. Who watches this crap for real?
This post was edited by WM BARR . =ABSOLUTE TRASH at November 6, 2016 3:27 PM MST
I never went to horror movies with a date. We went to the last remaining drive-in theatre in the area to watch stuff like Blazing Saddles and Cheech & Chong. That drive-in is still showing movies.
I find the first original "Halloween" movie very good. The rest of the films in the franchise that I've seen - - I've not seen a lot - - are not so good to me. :)
If that means I enjoy sucking donkey genitals, so be it. Ha! :)
Darn! I think that's the one of the ones I haven't seen! Or I've only seen parts of it. Is that one connected to children watching a TV show or something? If you like it, I should make sure to watch it, too. :)
Yep, that's it. It's pretty silly to be honest. John Carpenter's original intention for the Halloween franchise was for it to be an anthology series. Each unrelated to the other except that they all occurred on Halloween.