They is other media, will youtube ban anyone siting the story. Will FB allow it to be shared? Twitter not censoring now. Will other news media cover the story or ignore it?
They're covering it, it's just that they're reporting it is minority view in the intelligence community. When and if proof is provided, then we can say Trump was right. There's a first time for everything.
They've been reporting all along, from the beginnings of the outbreak. The fact that there was concern about the lab and the inspections of the lab and the market were all right there in the main stream media. As I said, we still do not have proof. We just don't know. You take one article and blow it up into Trump being right and that there is some conspiracy to cover this up. And if Trump is right it's not because he has any special knowledge, it would either be a lucky guess or that he is also right when he claimed he was clairvoyant.
MSM has been denying it. Since the beginning. Claiming it came from the wet market.
As the President, Trump did have special knowledge. The DOE reported to him that it believed it was an lab leak in a classified report as early as Mar of 2021.He had special knowledge from Fauci, he had Fauci in his ear, who from the beginning was worried about the lack. (Emails show this..Fauci knew he was funding gain of function research in China at the Wuhan lab)
Trump just chose to be honest with the people rather than lie or play games.
This post was edited by my2cents at February 28, 2023 4:50 AM MST
I don't know it kind of reminds me of the Infinite Monkey Theorem. Which is if a monkey bangs on a keyboard for a infinite amount of time it will eventually get it right and produce a novel. In Trump's case it is if he shoots his mouth off for a infinite amount of time sooner or later he will get something right. Cheers!
It's also being reported that this is still a minority view in the intelligence community, an inconvenient fact you conveniently ignored. Why are you grasping at straws for this guy? He doesn't care about you.
Nothing is proven yet, not even the WSJ, says that. That likelihood is based on US intelligence and we all know what your hero thinks of that. And the DOE isn't all that confident in it either. Funny how you pick and choose when the intelligence is accurate and when it isn't.
I pick what makes sense. Based on other information. St. FAUCI had emails showing where he was concerned it got out from them lab...he knew what they were working on.
Of course China rejects the idea that they released it from their lab. They do not want to have to take the responsibility for the devastation caused.
I know natural immunity is just as good/better than the covid jab. It only makes sense, that is why real vaccines work. They are admitting that now as well.
Got it. You pick what you want to believe because you personally think it makes sense. Must be great to be so much smarter than everyone. The difference between you and me, is that I choose to look at facts and data and make informed choices with the full understanding that even the experts get it wrong sometimes. I don't think the world is one big conspiracy.
Stu Spelling Bee 