Do you think the GOP earned their new nick-name?

The FBI (or) DOJ have over 100.000 pages and tapes about Epstein. And Trump will keep trying to stop or delay those un redacted files from reaching the public - even if he has to break a judges ruling. Trump had Maxwell moved from a high security prison to a minimum security facility and I’m sure she knows a presidential pardon is in her future. She has also been known lie - so the release of her interview only makes the American people see a cover up. Cheers and happy weekend!

As far as I know, the only thing that judges have ruled against releasing are Grand Jury transcripts. These are rarely  released and need a compelling reason. Here is some of what two of the judges said in their rulings not to release them:

I thought you might be interested in this analysis of Maxwell's interview. At the end, the psychologist makes a point I hadn't considered. By making the interview full of lies public, Maxwell is letting it be known that she will keep secrets. So the interview had multiple purposes - to get out ahead of the information in the files ( although no rational person would believe her), to give the illusion of transparency by releasing it, to protect Trump's reputation. The only one who benefited from this was Maxwell.

This post was edited by Jane S at August 24, 2025 5:03 PM MDT

I think every time she said “alleged victims” she should of burst into flames. Pretty sure she knows that they were actually victims that she put into the hands of pedophiles.

Cheers!

If the Epstein files are public record then why did the Congressional Oversight Committee have to subpoena them?

And why did James Comer say some of the files would eventually be made public?

Where did I say all of the files are public records? 
In fact, what I said is that many files are under seal and would require a judge to allow their release. And they would still be redacted somewhat (names of victims and unindicted people) Trump DOJ has requested permission to release those docts but the Judge (Obama appointed) denied the request. If as you posted above it is all public info already then the judge should have released so as not to give "the government " its "diversion."

But yes, there are indeed 1000s of released Epstein files.

Of course, not all records are court records, some are FBI records and those would also have to go through the redaction process as well. Which is likely why Comer said they would eventually be released. (After the reactions etc) This post was edited by my2cents at August 24, 2025 3:46 PM MDT

Nice spin. 

Just facts.   Obama judge says it is all public knowledge but he will keeps it sealed anyway.  

And any FBI papers will always have redactions. 

Just facts twisted to make it look like the government is doing everything it can to keep a campaign promise, when in fact they are not.

Because Grand Jury testimony can only legally be unsealed in very exceptional, very narrow, circumstances,  asking for it to be unsealed was just grandstanding by the DOJ to pretend they were doing something. They knew it would be denied.

Again, I said court doct AND FBI files are not released.

As I said, there are 1000s of Epstein docts already released.   
The rest are under lock by judges and the FBI. And when/if they release them they will redacted the victims and any unindicted persons.  Because the DOJ and gov are supposed to be better than the inquirer. This post was edited by my2cents at August 24, 2025 5:31 PM MDT