The Brexit campaign just won the referendum. One of their arguments was that the EU is not democratically accountable. Not quite true; we elect MEPs. It is only the European Commission that is not elected, but instead, appointed by the elected MEPs, to whom it only acts as a kind of steering group, anyway. But the House of Lords is not at all democratically accountable. So, if they are so big on democracy, why are they not equally vociferous in demanding democratic accountability in that?
I'm learning from you and your across the pond guys, Harry. I am just listening right now.
Your point is valid in a way that Lords is not elected.. But the Laws of the UK are made in the Parliament not in Lords.. Lords is a house of review not a house where laws are enacted.. Parliament is elected by the people.. So thats the difference.. If the UK is to fully be a democratic nation then Lords needs to be either ended or it's membership needs to be elected like other nations review houses which are usually called Senate's ...
The House of Lords only has the power to veto legislation not make legislation. It can therefore never take away our rights and is no threat to liberty.
The E.U. Commission makes legislation. It is the executive. That is a massive threat to us.
Any large union is intrinsically undemocratic. The larger and more diverse it is, the less democracy. The larger a group the more the individual is subjugated to the will of the collective.
It's not, it's different FROM the EU.
I am point is completely valid? He is point is completely valid? Do those sentences make sense? If not, why would "You are point is completely valid" make any more sense than those other two?
What's you're point.