Well if your MAIN guidepost is "will this hurt or help people" that ought to narrow it down a bit don'tcha think Swoop? For instance. Cutting $80 billion from programs that help people who need it so you can give $83 billion (give or take a few billion) in tax cuts for the rich ...who clearly don't need the help. How is that objectionable? Thank you for your reply! :)
You just agreed with my guidepost so Dems want illegal alien felons protected in their sanctuary cities and will not detain them for ICE. Directly disobeying the law to yes....... work against Trump being the only reason. Even a judge let one out the side door of the court room. We do have to deal with the crimes of our people that are legally here but we should not have to deal with those who do not belong here when they commit crimes. And the rich are not the only ones getting a tax break. The Left loves to say that as makes them feel all is for the rich. The Middle class is also getting tax breaks.
If every Pol voted to help those who needed it and didn't take away their safety nets in order to give tax cuts to the wealthy who don't need the help it why wouldn't that work? Thank you for your reply Glis and Happy Thursday! :)
((hugs)) You just elevated my question tremendously whistle. I did not think of that. I'm glad you did. I surely would try my dam*dest to live up to it! Thank you for your splendid reply and Happy Thursday m'dear! :) Yes. I really love your answer! :)
Benedict Arnold 