Active Now

Shuhak
Zack
Discussion » Questions » Legal » Out of all the charges thrown at the murder suspect in the Charlottesville riot why is not one of them "terrorism"?

Out of all the charges thrown at the murder suspect in the Charlottesville riot why is not one of them "terrorism"?

Do you notice how Fake News does not call it a riot? Open your eyes to how the narrative is scripted to preserve image.

Posted - August 19, 2017

Responses


  • 46117

    One of them is TERRORISM. 

    I noticed that.  I see it everywhere on everyone's lips. But the larger name that covers that and more, is RACIST HATERS who KILL PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT WHITE.

      August 19, 2017 12:13 PM MDT
    0

  • 17620
    As far as I can tell there is no terrorism charge.  I don't really see why there would be based on the Patriot Act.  I don't know all the facts I'm sure.
      August 19, 2017 3:35 PM MDT
    0

  • 5614
    The bar is high when there is a global image to protect. Much lower when supporting the narrative of who the real terrorists are. This post was edited by O-uknow at August 19, 2017 3:51 PM MDT
      August 19, 2017 3:49 PM MDT
    0

  • 5614
    As far as anyone can tell. Sometimes its better to see with your physical two eyes than trying to see through your third.
      August 19, 2017 4:00 PM MDT
    1

  • 17620
    My third?
      August 19, 2017 4:41 PM MDT
    0

  • 5614
    Third eye or pineal gland. References to it are made throughout history. You have it on your dollar bill. God uses it to speak to you but when you yourself open it up you invite demonic influences and deception.
      August 19, 2017 5:53 PM MDT
    1

  • 17620
    This is a crime to be handled by state law.

    Section 802 of the USA PATRIOT Act defines domestic terrorism.  The present case seems to me to be a crime under state law. This post was edited by Thriftymaid at August 19, 2017 3:33 PM MDT
      August 19, 2017 3:12 PM MDT
    0

  • 5614
    Any act of domestic terrorism you can name can be handled under state law and re-labeled anything but. Again the narrative of who terrorists are not is being maintained. When an individual of a certain demographic commits an act of terror it is deemed only a crime so not to link the act to the demographic group whose image is at stake. This post was edited by O-uknow at August 19, 2017 4:37 PM MDT
      August 19, 2017 3:52 PM MDT
    1

  • 2500
    What do you think qualifies his actions as an act of "terrorism"?
      August 19, 2017 4:31 PM MDT
    0

  • 5614
    The same thing that qualifies the Boston marathon bomber's acts as terrorism.
      August 19, 2017 5:50 PM MDT
    0

  • 2500
    I was unaware that any bombs had been set off in C-ville, which was the act of terrorism in Boston. So, you want to have another shot at explaining why it was an act of terrorism? Do you have any idea? 

    As a matter of fact can you produce a "legal" definition for the word "terrorism"? This post was edited by Salt and Red Pepper at August 19, 2017 10:12 PM MDT
      August 19, 2017 10:10 PM MDT
    0

  • doesn't really fit any of the parameters.  It would be redfining terrorism into a watered down concept with no real distinction that could be applied to any violent act or crime.
      August 19, 2017 11:10 PM MDT
    0