Discussion»Statements»Rosie's Corner» IF Hillary Cllinton were prez and had installed her daughter/son-in-law in government as Trump has how would YOU have reacted? Why?
Oh. Gee thanks. Because they are not? They have no power?
When was the last time you were invited to sit next to a leader of another country with your dad?
https://www.cnn.com/videos/cnnmoney/2017/04/24/john-oliver-ivanka-jared-kushner-role.hln
This post was edited by WM BARR . =ABSOLUTE TRASH at September 7, 2017 11:18 AM MDT
I mean they haven't been GIVEN power. They only have the indirect powers they would've had anyway because of their influence on him.
First ladies have always had this kind of power, but nobody considers it nepotism. There is no reason not to extend the concept of first lady to first son/ daughter when a president has adult children.
Sitting next to the leader of another coutnry is not power. It's nothing. It exerts no significant influence whatsoever.
Political comedy shows are pure propaganda and are not worthy of a response.
This post was edited by Zeitgeist at September 7, 2017 11:51 AM MDT
Oh they haven't been given power. Really? That's news to the rest of us.
I guess they just manage to steal it. The apple doesn't fall far from the tree.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jared-kushner-donald-trump-whisperer-possible-white-house-role/
This post was edited by WM BARR . =ABSOLUTE TRASH at September 7, 2017 11:54 AM MDT
1. She would not do that because she knows how to do things by the political book.
2. If she appointed someone it would be because of their ability not their blood line.
3. Anyone she has in her family is so much more able to do any job that Trump has offered to his minions.
But we will never know because the election was stolen from her.
And you are pissed that she is writing a book. Are you SERIOUS? This is what I have been waiting for for the last 7 months. I thought that was why you were posting all these questions. So, I don't get your take on calling her a whiney loser.