All I did was ask what motivates Leftism? I got a lot of angry reactions, no real answer. Then complained that you guys are just reacting not talking. Then it was deleted. Why is this website so sensitive?
From your "question": " It's as if leftists are essentially anti-white and desire an overpopulating subhuman race."
Maybe next time, in your oh-so-honest and ingenuous search for truth, you might not want to refer to non-white people as "subhuman".
I didn't
https://www.google.ca/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&e...
What motivates Leftism? - answerMug
I was just about to email you to explain why when I saw this question. Rpf explained it well. It was removed for racism.
Hello S:
Oh, you poor, poor victim.. All you did was call black people subhuman.. I mean, what's wrong with that?
excon
Whoa whoa whoa, excon. He was clearly referring to any non-white race as subhuman. Don't be so racist against blacks, you leftist!
I forgot what you said and how you said it. They are pretty tolerant on here about that stuff unless heated arguments started and you provoked it.
It must have not been that big of a question or that important because no one noticed but you. Ask something else and get over it.
I just read what JA said . If you are trying that racist crap, just go now and get it over with and troll another site. We do not tolerate racist remarks EVER.
Personally, I prefer it when bigots make their bigotry plain instead of hiding behind coded language. But the AM management apparently disagrees.
I thought your "question" was a perfectly legitimate expression of a perfectly disgusting hateful opinion, and little different from similar opinions express by other AM members. But I guess we have some standards some of the time.
If this is a problem for you, you'll find a much more agreeable audience (who will gladly confirm your existing prejudices) over at stormfront.org. or similar sites.
No, it was definitely racist. Not even in a coded language, dog-whistle kind of way, just a straight up, blatant, whites-are-superior-to-other-races, "non-whites are subhuman" way. It wasn't even slightly ambiguous.
@Stepper -- I don't see how the terms "anti-white" and "subhuman" can be rationally interpreted in any other context except racism.
You can argue (as I have) that such racist assertions should be permissible. But denying they are racist is just silly.
How is the allegedly anti-white stance of leftists connected to the idea of humans "downbreeding back into animals"?
It would be be prudent to make these types of inquiries through private messaging rather than openly.
Thanks
You need to ask JA that question.
That would be best.
I think you may have answered your own question, Saltlick. You said yourself it got a lot of angry reactions and no real answer. Could that be the reason why it was deleted? I very much suspect it is.
It's not. And using the phrase "downbreeding into animals" shows one of two things (or both):
1) Rather substantial bigotry
2) A really BAD understanding of biology, genetics, etc.
@Stepper -- I hope you have a good chiropractor, because after bending over backwards that hard to create an alternative reality where the original question does NOT contain an ignorant bigoted Straw Man, you're going to need some work.
As I noted before, I'd be perfectly happy to let this guy's nonsense stand and make popcorn while more educated people eviscerated it. But I see no reason to grant much benefit of the doubt when someone's question translates to, "Why do TEH STOOPID EBIL LIBRUHLZ hate White People and want us to breed into sub-humans?" That's not genuine inquiry. That's bigotry and stupidity on display.