Sometimes the US brings a Nuclear sub into Nanoose Bay for exercises (but they have no nuclear weapons on board). Now I'm starting to wonder/worry that if Trump is elected and he alines him self with Russia will I one day see a Russian sub on exercise with a US sub in Nanoose Bay. If that ever happens I'm going down to the Bay and tap out humorous morse code messages to the Russian commander like - Does your under water vessel have a Poop-deck - why don't you go use it? The Cold wars not over. Cheers!
Clinton did that by making sure Putin controls much of the Earth's uranium. You aren't keeping up.
Trump........no worries.
Nah.
You haven't seen one yet, have you? The Russians have pretty good stealth technology for their subs so you'll never know.
I didn't know that about Clinton (are your talking about former President Clinton). Does Russia still control most of the uranium? Like that can't be good. Cheers!
No I just seen an American one - it was way out in the straight and it still looked huge. Cheers!
Just send them a case of Stolichnaya Vodka and you will be fine.
Peter Sweizer's book Clinton Cash does a good job explaining the foreign donations to the Clinton Foundation with the time line of Secretary of State Clinton's decisions. It is worth reading, regardless of political persuasion. The documentary of the same name is on youtube. She made things happen. Bill gives a speech and gets ridiculous payments for them and money flows to the foundation. Follow the money.
Oh, and Russia even controls 20% of the uranium in the lower 48. The Secretary of State is the most powerful diplomat in the world. I had never thought about that, but it is true.
Ya but I would spike it with a bunch of laxatives first. Cheers and happy weekend!
What class of sub? (Just curious. No worries if you don't know. They're kinda hard to tell apart if you're at a distance and aren't intimately familiar with the various vessels.)
But I'm not surprised that you saw one if you were looking seaward. Unlike Russian submarines I don't think that US subs will be trying to hide from our neighbors to the north.
No they weren't trying to hide - it was mutual scheduled exercise with the US and Canadian Navy a couple of years ago at the base. There is a lot of interesting history to the base so I will include a link. Cheers and happy weekend!
http://www.bbcf.ca/_articles/2006/june/experimental_nanoose.htm
You could also google "
OK, but please cite me an actual fact that backs up your statement about Putin and uranium. Unless you do, I call BS and believe you're just spewing nonsense without any real, intelligent thought.
Thanks for the link to the info. Looks like some interesting reading and a good springboard for a Google search.
Happy weekend to you too!
For what it's worth...
There Are Over Twenty Reasons Not To Believe Clinton Cash: Analysis of the book found numerous errors, fabrications, and distortions. Media outlets tore apart Schweizer's allegation that Hillary Clinton played a "central role" in approving a Russian uranium deal for Clinton Foundation donors. He made multiple errors in a section alleging Bill Clinton's speaking fees influenced State Department grants in Haiti. He cited as fact a press release that was revealed as a hoax years before. He took a former U.S. ambassador's words "badly out of context," drawing condemnation from the individual. He erred in his conspiracy about Hillary Clinton's vote on an India nuclear deal. He excluded multiple pieces of exculpatory evidence that undermine his claims. He hypocritically attacked the Clintons for engaging in the same behavior that Schweizer's former boss, George W. Bush, did. And he alleged Clinton conspiracies that, in the words of third parties who reviewed his work, have "no evidence," are "circumstantial," and have "no smoking gun."
Prior to Clinton Cash, reporters and fact checkers have excoriated Schweizer for massive factual problems. A Media Matters analysis found at least 10 separate incidents in which media called out Schweizer for botching his reporting.
Your failure to respond with actual facts means that your whole post is BS. Just as I figured.
