.
Not at all. Or if it does it is figuratively, eg: "The harlots of Babylon"
the 11th commandment
Thou cannot act
Of course.
I think it's in the Apochraphora ... and yeah, it's probably spelt wrong ... biblical scholar I'm not :)
Lol:)
I think it's either spelled as arachnophobia or maybe apocrapha?
It's "Apocrypha".
Ah ha!
I've heard of Apocrypha before, and when I Googled "Apocrapha" it autocorrected it by saying "Did you mean "Apocrypha"? Lol:)
Lol. The original KJV had the Apocrypha in it.
http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/1611_1-Esdras-Chapter-1/
Will there ever be a new version of the Bible which reinstates all the passages that King James removed from the original and also includes a special warning from God that in the year 1611 AD a power-crazy lunatic known as King James will tamper with the Holy Scriptures and lead believers astray? Now that would be something to behold!
Textual criticism and the older manuscripts available now like the Vatican MS 1209, the Sinaiticus, both from the 4th century and the Alexandrian from the 5th century and the dead sea scrolls make the modern translations we have today more accurate.
I believe that people who believe in the Bible should believe in the original version of the Bible, not something that has been altered to suit King James or some other nutter. After all, it is not about modern-day life, is it? It's a religion that had been around for a very long time before King James was born, and some people still believe in that particular religion, which they are entitled to believe, while others don't and they are entitled not to. Either way, I say the original is what counts, not something that was altered to suit one person's weird idiosyncrasies and was accepted just because he happened to be the King at the time.
I agree. The KJV was based on newer manuscripts as in that time period, the older manuscripts were not available.
Here's a question I asked in reference to the King James camp:
http://answermug.com/forum/topics/why-do-king-james-only-people-know-so-little-about-biblical
Yes Charles 1:1 "Once upon a time there were three very different little girls who grew up to be three very different women with three things in common: they're brilliant, they're beautiful, and they work for me. My name is Charlie."
I wish this site had an "Asker's Pick" feature like Answerbag did. No doubt which answer to this question would get it! Lol:)
aw thanks andy :)
