She had a dress on. Now we cannot show big boobs at all? This is stupid.
Server... the nudity is a server thing. The company that hosts the data. It may seem like a minor thing, but to a techie, it's a world of difference. We're not part of or affiliated with any other website.
I am opening up a risque photo section on the redesigned site, but the Muggers, in general, have made it clear they want the majority of the site to be clean, so that will stay. I don't ever want to host outright porn, but I don't care if people share more risque photos in the adult area after we move to a new server.
I agree. She is quite fetching even without considering those generously-sized mammaries. I might even consider voting for her if she were to run against Trump. ;>)
Wouldn't matter what your intentions are. People's nature is to push the envelope. It would turn into porn. I mean, this thread, right here is about somebody pushing the envelope in a "funny" way. Watch.
I'm aware of what some people do. As long as there are people, there will be those who either intentionally or unintentionally push the envelope and there will be people with different interpretations of the rules, as well as whether that same piece of content violates the rules. You can't have a site where people add content and expect to not have to moderate it in some fashion. We're lucky in that most of our members learn from the experiences, so if I tell someone I've had to remove their content, I usually only have to do it once.
Even just you posting this thorough comment will be helpful to those with questions.
I've found I have to watch my words, not through anyone else saying so, but just thinking a little more clearly about how limits work.
I knew it!
~
Yes that is stupid.
sometimes twice. )
Cats at first I thought so too. I thought it was overreacting until other members start posting more lurid photos to top one another. I don't need to encourage smut. IT wasn't intended that way.
