Dead is dead. Ya don't want babies murdered before they're born but you VICIOUSLY attack teens surviving a MASSACRE! WHY?

I am prolife. I am progun. I have not attacks these teens. I do not think they should be allowed to take my gun when I did nothing wrong.

I haven't attacked anyone. And you're right, I don't want babies murdered because I am pro life. I am also pro rights, or gun person as you put it. Yes, what those children had to go through was horrible and senseless and they shouldn't be attacked for speaking out. However, the agenda-driven media also needs to stop their sick exploitation these same "children". If anyone needed proof of the moral and intellectual depravity alive and well in mainstream media across America, you’re getting all the evidence you could need coming out of Parkland, Florida. There, without any apparent moral dignity, ethical guideposts or mature judgment, major media anchors are shoving microphones in front of the faces of grieving, scarred, and emotional teenagers, exploiting them for one reason: they are saying what media progressives want said. I say to that, leave them alone. Let them grieve and let them heal in their own way. If anyone is attacking these children, it's the media. This post was edited by rusureamisure? at April 8, 2018 6:05 PM MDT

This question is an exhibit of how the leftist mind operates. So many false comparisons I don't know where to begin..... You make everything about feelings, when feelings are IRRELEVANT. This is a matter of LAW. RIGHTS are ABOVE feelings.

I don't defend the right to life based on how much someone "means to me". My feelings are not relevant. Life is a right (i.e. it shall not be TAKEN without just cause.) EVERYONE has it regardless of my feelings. I don't defend someone's right to bear arms based on how much they mean to me. I defend it on principle.

There is no right to physical protection. NO ONE HAS IT. (Physical protection is a privilege granted by the state. Society does its best to provide protection, but we aren't entitled to it. It's a public service.) There is no right to psychological protection. NO ONE HAS IT. If being criticised upsets someone that's their problem. I'm not responsible for their feelings. They are.

The political arena is no place for children. If you assert someone is old enough to speak and be heard in the political arena, they are old enough to face criticism. You can't have it both ways.

You are upset about their treatment, because YOU KNOW THEY ARE TOO YOUNG AND IMMATURE to be playing this adult game. 

Shame on the left for using brainwashed traumatised children as shields for its agenda. This post was edited by Zeitgeist at April 9, 2018 8:46 PM MDT